Assessment of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Wash: Inter‐Rater Agreement Using Photographs

[1]  Stephen S Raab,et al.  Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  K. Shah,et al.  Adjunctive testing for cervical cancer in low resource settings with visual inspection, HPV, and the Pap smear , 2001, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[3]  J. Sellors,et al.  Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[4]  T. Wright,et al.  Evaluation of alternative methods of cervical cancer screening for resource‐poor settings , 2000, Cancer.

[5]  M. Sideri,et al.  Inter‐observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: results of an European collaborative study , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  T. Wright,et al.  Cervical cancer prevention using visual screening methods , 1999 .

[7]  University of ZimbabweJHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Miller,et al.  Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  D. Parkin,et al.  Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors , 1998, Cancer.

[10]  L Burke,et al.  Colposcopy Quality Control: Establishing Colposcopy Criterion Standards for the National Cancer Institute ALTS Trial Using Cervigrams , 1998, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[11]  Scott B. Cantor,et al.  COLPOSCOPY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESIONS: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. Dunn,et al.  Observer variability among colposcopists from the West Midlands region , 1997, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[13]  P. Bitterman,et al.  Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. , 1995, JAMA.

[15]  David R. Scott,et al.  Toward objective quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Correlation of cytopathologic diagnoses with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus types. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  S Cecchini,et al.  Testing Cervicography and Cervicoscopy as Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer , 1993, Tumori.

[17]  A. Beeby Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  D. L. Byrne,et al.  Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern. , 1991, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  A. Vincenti,et al.  Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  J. Paavonen,et al.  Observer Variability in the Scoring of Colpophotographs , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  A J Robertson,et al.  Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. , 1989, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1989, BMJ.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[25]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.