Optimization of Dynamic Response Using Temporal Spectral Element Method

The design of systems for dynamic response may involve constraints that need to be satisfied over an entire time interval or objective functions evaluated over the interval. Efficiently performing the constrained optimization is challenging, since the typical response is implicitly linked to the design variables through a numerical integration of the governing differential equations. Evaluating constraints is costly, as is the determination of sensitivities to variations in the design variables. In this paper, we investigate the application of a temporal spectral element method to the optimization of transient and time-periodic responses of fundamental engineering systems. Through the spectral discretization, the response is computed globally, thereby enabling a more explicit connection between the response and design variables and facilitating the efficient computation of response sensitivities. Furthermore, the response is captured in a higher order manner to increase analysis accuracy. Two applications of the coupling of dynamic response optimization with the temporal spectral element method are demonstrated. The first application, a one-degree-of-freedom, linear, impact absorber, is selected from the auto industry, and tests the ability of the method to treat transient constraints over a large-time interval. The second application, a related mass-spring-damper system, shows how the method can be used to obtain work and amplitude optimal time-periodic control force subject to constraints over a periodic time interval.

[1]  Mohammad H. Kurdi,et al.  Spectral element method in time for rapidly actuated systems , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Parametric Constraints with Application to Optimization for Flutter Using a Continuous Flutter Constraint , 1975 .

[3]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Applied optimal design: Mechanical and structural systems , 1979 .

[4]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Optimal Control of LCOs in Aero-Structural Systems Having your (nonlinear) cake and eating it too , 2006 .

[5]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  PATH OPTIMIZATION OF FLAPPING AIRFOILS BASED ON NURBS , 2007 .

[6]  L.F.P. Etman,et al.  Design Optimization of Multibody Systems by Sequential Approximation , 1998 .

[7]  L. Watson,et al.  Design-oriented identification of critical times in transient response , 1986 .

[8]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[9]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  A review of optimization of structures subjected to transient loads , 2006 .

[10]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles , 1999 .

[11]  J. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response , 1984 .

[12]  R. W. Mayne,et al.  Optimum Design of an Impact Absorber , 1974 .

[13]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Efficient identification of critical stresses in structures subject to dynamic loads , 1986 .

[14]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Spectral/hp Element Methods for CFD , 1999 .

[15]  David S. Burnett,et al.  Finite Element Analysis: From Concepts to Applications , 1987 .

[16]  K. D. Willmert,et al.  Optimum Design of a Linear Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Shock Isolation System , 1972 .

[17]  David L. Raney,et al.  Mechanization and Control Concepts for Biologically Inspired Micro Air Vehicles , 2004 .

[18]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Nonlinear Transient Response and Second-Order Sensitivity Using Time Finite Element Method , 1999 .