Coexistence dilemmas in European marine spatial planning practices. The case of marine renewables and marine protected areas

The question whether coexistence of marine renewable energy (MRE) projects and marine protected areas (MPAs) is a common spatial policy in Europe and how a number of factors can affect it, has been addressed by empirical research undertaken in eleven European marine areas. Policy drivers and objectives that are assumed to affect coexistence, such as the fulfillment of conservation objectives and the prioritization of other competing marine uses, were scored by experts and predictions were crosschecked with state practice. While in most areas MRE-MPA coexistence is not prohibited by law, practice indicates resistance towards it. Furthermore expert judgment demonstrated that a number of additional factors, such as the lack of suitable space for MRE projects and the uncertainty about the extent of damage by MRE to the MPA, might influence the intentions of the two major parties involved (i.e. the MRE developer and the MPA authority) to pursue or avoid coexistence. Based on these findings, the interactions of these two players are further interpreted, their policy implications are discussed, while the need towards efficient, fair and acceptable MRE-MPA coexistence is highlighted.

[1]  Steven Degraer,et al.  Bargaining a net gain compensation agreement between a marine renewable energy developer and a marine protected area manager , 2015 .

[2]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[4]  S. Lyster,et al.  The Convention on the Conservation of migratory species of wild animals. The Bonn Convention. by Simon Lyster , 1989 .

[5]  M. Elliott,et al.  Marine habitats: loss and gain, mitigation and compensation. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[6]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Co-location of activities and designations: A means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning? , 2014 .

[7]  Dan Wilhelmsson,et al.  The Influence of Fisheries Exclusion and Addition of Hard Substrata on Fish and Crustaceans , 2014 .

[8]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  WINDSPEED. Roadmap to the deployment of offshore wind energy in the Central and Southern North Sea , 2011 .

[9]  Alan Simcock,et al.  Ospar Convention On The Protection Of The Marine Environment Of The North-East Atlantic , 2006 .

[10]  A. Bahaj New research in tidal current energy , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Harold Levrel,et al.  Biodiversity offsets for offshore wind farm projects: The current situation in Europe , 2014 .

[12]  A. Clément,et al.  Wave energy in Europe: current status and perspectives , 2002 .

[13]  O. Langhamer Artificial Reef Effect in relation to Offshore Renewable Energy Conversion: State of the Art , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[14]  M. Witt,et al.  Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to biodiversity? An urgent call for research , 2009 .

[15]  Stuart I. Rogers,et al.  The environmental interactions of tidal and wave energy generation devices , 2012 .

[16]  Peter J S Jones,et al.  Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings , 2016 .

[17]  J. Weber,et al.  Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2012 .

[18]  Wanfei Qiu,et al.  The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe , 2013 .

[19]  M. Witt,et al.  Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds , 2010 .

[20]  Thomas Kirk Sørensen,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas: A generic framework for implementation of ecosystem based marine management and its application , 2013 .

[21]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The Habitat-Creation Potential of Offshore Wind Farms , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[22]  Sylvain Pioch,et al.  The multi-use in wind farm projects: more conflicts or a win-win opportunity? , 2011 .

[23]  P. I. Miller,et al.  Assessing wave energy effects on biodiversity: the Wave Hub experience , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Andrew L. Jackson,et al.  Renewable energy vs. biodiversity: Policy conflicts and the future of nature conservation , 2011 .

[25]  E. Olsen,et al.  Integration at the Round Table: Marine Spatial Planning in Multi-Stakeholder Settings , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  H. Lindeboom,et al.  Offshore wind park monitoring programmes, lessons learned and recommendations for the future , 2015, Hydrobiologia.