Which advanced heart failure therapy strategy is optimal for patients over 60 years old?

BACKGROUND The optimal advanced heart failure (HF) therapy strategy for patients aged 60 or older with end-stage HF refractory to optimal medical therapy remains uncertain. This study compares outcomes of three advanced HF therapy strategies in this patient population. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 95 patients aged 60-73 years who had undergone isolated heart transplantation (HTx) or continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation from 2010 to 2017. Patients were stratified into three cohorts by strategy; HTx-only (N.=25), LVAD-to-HTx (N.=29), and LVAD-only (N.=41). Primary end point was 2-year overall survival. Secondary end points included incidence of post-operative adverse events, freedom from first readmission at 1 year, and percentage of days spent in hospital following advanced HF therapy. RESULTS Two-year survival was 91% in HTx-only patients, 88% in LVAD-to-HTx patients, and 49% in LVAD-only patients (P=0.0008). No significant difference in post-transplant survival was found between patients with or without LVAD-related adverse events preceding transplantation (P=0.42). One-year freedom from first readmission was 38.3% in HTx-only patients, 17.2% in LVAD-to-HTx patients and 7.3% in LVAD-only patients (P=0.0028). Patients in LVAD-to-HTx cohort had higher incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding (38% vs. 3%; P<0.01), major bleeding (28% vs. 3%; P=0.02), and right heart failure (69% vs. 31%; P<0.01) during post-LVAD period compared with post-HTx period. Their percentage of days spent in hospital during post-LVAD period was significantly higher than post-HTx period (7.9% vs. 1.2%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our experience with patients over 60 years old undergoing advanced therapy suggests that HTx-only and LVAD-to-HTx strategies had superior medium-term survival than LVAD-only strategy. LVAD-to-HTx strategy is effective in reducing incidence of adverse events and percentage of hospitalized days in this specific patient population.

[1]  N. Nair,et al.  Reviewing the use of ventricular assist devices in the elderly: where do we stand today? , 2018, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[2]  M. Russo,et al.  Impact of Left-Ventricular Assist Device-Related Complications on Posttransplant Graft Survival. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  N. Smedira,et al.  Optimal Timing of Heart Transplant After HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Robert L Kormos,et al.  Eighth annual INTERMACS report: Special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. , 2017, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[5]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Can a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Individuals with Advanced Systolic Heart Failure Improve or Reverse Frailty? , 2017, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  W. Aronow,et al.  Left Ventricular Assist Device in Older Adults. , 2017, Heart failure clinics.

[7]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[8]  Y. Naka,et al.  Changes in End-Organ Function in Patients With Prolonged Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  L. Lund,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant. , 2016, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[10]  G. Stewart,et al.  Advanced Heart Failure: Prevalence, Natural History, and Prognosis. , 2016, Heart failure clinics.

[11]  S. Marasco,et al.  Cost comparison of heart transplant vs. left ventricular assist device therapy at one year , 2016, Clinical transplantation.

[12]  Y. Naka,et al.  Prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support and posttransplantation outcomes: A new challenge. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  M. Acker,et al.  Dealing with surgical left ventricular assist device complications. , 2015, Journal of thoracic disease.

[14]  G. Felker,et al.  Comparison of 2-Year Outcomes of Extended Criteria Cardiac Transplantation Versus Destination Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy Using Continuous Flow. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  K. Dickstein,et al.  The patient perspective: Quality of life in advanced heart failure with frequent hospitalisations. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[16]  D. Mancini,et al.  Comparison of outcomes after heart replacement therapy in patients over 65 years old. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  Snehal R. Patel,et al.  Heart transplantation versus continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: comprehensive cost at 1 year. , 2015, Journal of cardiac failure.

[18]  V. Roger,et al.  Understanding the Epidemic of Heart Failure: Past, Present, and Future , 2014, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[19]  Gani Bajraktari,et al.  Mortality in heart failure patients , 2014, Anatolian journal of cardiology.

[20]  Ranjit John,et al.  Hemolysis, pump thrombus, and neurologic events in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  E. McGee,et al.  Predictors of hospital length of stay after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: an analysis of the INTERMACS registry. , 2012, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[22]  M. Redfield,et al.  Who has advanced heart failure?: definition and epidemiology. , 2011, Congestive heart failure.

[23]  L. Lund,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2017; Focus Theme: Allograft ischemic time. , 2017, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.