What Is the Impact of On-street Parking Information for Drivers?

Parking Guidance and Information (PGI) solutions are a well-known class of Intelligent Transportation Systems meant to support drivers by recommending locations and routes with higher chance to find parking. However, the relevance of such systems for on-street parking spaces is barely studied. In this paper, we investigate the consequences of providing the drivers with different parking information to the search. Based on real-world parking data from San Francisco, we investigated the scenario in which a driver does not find a parking space at the destination and has to decide on the next road to go. We consider three different scenarios: (I) No parking availability information; (II) static information about the capacity of a road segment and temporary parking limitations; (III) real-time information collected from stationary sensors. Clearly the latter has strong implications in terms of deployment and operational costs. These scenarios lead to three different guidance strategies for a PGI system. The empirical experiments we conducted on real on-street parking data from San Francisco show that there is a significant reduction of parking search with more informed strategies, and that the use of real-time information offers only a limited improvement over static one.

[1]  Itzhak Benenson,et al.  PARKAGENT: An agent-based model of parking in the city , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Real-Time Street Parking Availability Estimation , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management.

[3]  Panta Lucic,et al.  Intelligent parking systems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Quantifying the potential savings in travel time resulting from parking guidance systems — a simulation case study , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Seppo Törmä,et al.  Mobile crowdsensing of parking space using geofencing and activity recognition , 2014 .

[6]  D. Shoup Cruising for Parking , 2006 .

[7]  Dirk C. Mattfeld,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Clustering for a Parking Prediction Service , 2014, 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  Monika Sester,et al.  What are the potentialities of crowdsourcing for dynamic maps of on-street parking spaces? , 2016, IWCTS@SIGSPATIAL.

[9]  Yi Huang,et al.  Smart Parking Guidance, Monitoring and Reservations: A Review , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[10]  Monika Sester,et al.  Learning On-Street Parking Maps from Position Information of Parked Vehicles , 2016, AGILE Conf..

[11]  Sergio Di Martino,et al.  How many probe vehicles do we need to collect on-street parking information? , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[12]  Bo Xu,et al.  UPDetector: sensing parking/unparking activities using smartphones , 2014, IWCTS@SIGSPATIAL.

[13]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Is the Curb 80% Full or 20% Empty? Assessing the Impacts of San Francisco's Parking Pricing Experiment , 2014 .

[14]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Effectiveness of the parking guidance information system in Frankfurt am Main , 1994 .

[15]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  Crowdsensing Maps of On-street Parking Spaces , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems.

[16]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Modelling drivers’ car parking behaviour using data from a travel choice simulator , 2004 .

[17]  Karel Martens,et al.  The Potential Impact of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication on On-Street Parking Under Heterogeneous Conditions , 2016, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[18]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  ParkNet: drive-by sensing of road-side parking statistics , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[19]  Fan Ye,et al.  Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.