Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases

BackgroundRobotic surgery is a new technology which may expand the variety of operations a surgeon can perform with minimally invasive techniques. We present a retrospective review of our first 100 consecutive robotic cases in children.MethodsA three-arm robot was used with one camera arm and two instrument arms. Additional accessory ports were utilized as necessary. Two different attending surgeons performed the procedures.ResultsTwenty-four different types of procedures were completed using the robot. The majority of the procedures (89%) were abdominal procedures with 11% thoracic. No urology or cardiac procedures were performed. Age ranged from 1 day to 23 years with an average age of 8.4 years. Weight ranged from 2.2 to 103 kg with a median weight of 27.9 kg. Twenty-two patients were less than 10.0 kg. Examples of cases included gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, hepatobiliary, surgical oncology, and congenital anomalies. The overall majority of cases had never been performed minimally invasively by the authors. The overall intraoperative conversion rate to open surgery was 13%. One case (1%) was converted to thoracoscopic because of lack of domain for the articulating instruments. No conversions or complications occurred as a result of injuries from the robotic instruments. Interestingly, four abdominal cases were converted to open surgery due to equipment failures or injuries from standard laparoscopic instruments used through non-robotic accessory ports.ConclusionsRobotic surgery is safe and effective in children. An enormous variety of cases can be safely performed including complex cases in neonates and small children. Simple operations such as cholecystectomies have minimal advantages by using robotic technology but can serve as excellent teaching tools for residents and newcomers to this form of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The technology is ideal for complex hepatobiliary cases and thoracic surgery, particularly solid chest masses.

[1]  M. Špaček,et al.  Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: A review of 30 cases. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  C. Albanese,et al.  Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies. , 2006, Seminars in pediatric surgery.

[3]  Mitchell C. Benson,et al.  From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience , 2007, World Journal of Urology.

[4]  D. Albala,et al.  Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Urology.

[5]  Michelle F. Benoit,et al.  Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  M. Ryska,et al.  [Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews]. , 2006, Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti.

[7]  K. Georgeson,et al.  The learning curve associated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery in infants and children. , 1997, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[8]  C. Albanese,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[9]  Craig A. Peters,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopy applied to reconstructive surgeries in children , 2006, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. , 2006, Urology.

[11]  E. Wilson,et al.  Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[12]  E. Castle,et al.  Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? , 2006, Urology.

[13]  S. Langenburg,et al.  Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair in children using robotic instruments. , 2005, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[14]  T. Guzzo,et al.  Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Fatih Atug,et al.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[16]  R. Woo,et al.  Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[17]  A. Costello,et al.  Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy , 2006, BJU international.