The standardization journey and the path ahead

Standardization of clinical laboratory test results has progressed through several stages. External quality assessment (EQA) identified that results were not equivalent in different laboratories in the 1950s. Approaches to use the same methods were promoted in the 1960s and the challenges recognized during the 1970s as in vitro diagnostics manufacturers introduced a variety of technologies to meet the demand for clinical laboratory testing services. Hierarchies of national reference systems were developed in the 1980–1990 period that were hampered by inadequate understanding of the importance of commutable reference materials both for use as calibrators and for EQA. Standards for metrological traceability were developed by the International Organization for Standardization in the 2000s that provided a global approach for establishing robust standardization for approximately 100 measurands. The limitations of non-commutable reference materials became widely appreciated in the 2000s. In 2010 and going forward, laboratory medicine recognized the need for harmonization approaches for the large number of measurands for which higher order certified reference materials and reference measurement procedures are not available. Metrological traceability to certified reference materials and reference measurement procedures remains the first choice when technologically feasible. Metrological traceability to an international harmonization protocol provides an alternative when no other approach is realistically feasible. Achieving equivalent results among different medical laboratory measurement procedures remains an important goal to enable appropriate medical decisions based on laboratory results and decision values included in clinical practice guidelines.

[1]  F. Sunderman Forty-five years of proficiency testing. , 1991, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[2]  W Greg Miller,et al.  Why commutability matters. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  Graham R D Jones,et al.  The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) - its history and operation. , 2016, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[4]  F. Sunderman,et al.  A survey of the accuracy of chemical analyses in clinical laboratories. , 1947, Manitoba medical review.

[5]  B. Velkeniers,et al.  Harmonization of Serum Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Measurements Paves the Way for the Adoption of a More Uniform Reference Interval. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  Hubert W Vesper,et al.  Reference materials and commutability. , 2007, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[8]  David M Bunk,et al.  Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  Cas Weykamp,et al.  Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  S. J. Smith,et al.  A reference method laboratory network for cholesterol: a model for standardization and improvement of clinical laboratory measurements. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  W Greg Miller,et al.  Commutability still matters. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  L M Thienpont,et al.  Trueness verification in European external quality assessment schemes: time to care about the quality of the samples , 2003, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[13]  G Lepschy,et al.  What is the Standard , 2002 .

[14]  W Greg Miller,et al.  Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[15]  E. King,et al.  Normal values for blood constituents; inter-hospital differences. , 1953, Lancet.

[16]  [Measurement of quantities in samples of biological origin requirements for content and presentation of reference measurement procedures]. , 2014, Klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika.

[17]  W Greg Miller,et al.  The roadmap for harmonization: status of the International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.