Development and evaluation of a robust temperature sensitive algorithm for long term NO2 gas sensor network data correction

Abstract Low-cost sensors (LCS) for air-quality monitoring have shown huge potential in enhancing spatial and temporal resolutions at a lower cost, greater flexibility in use and with less maintenance than fixed-air quality monitoring stations (AQMS). There are numerous reports showing sensor-based systems perform well under laboratory conditions. However, the accuracy of LCS operated under field conditions has been reported to deviate from their use in these controlled environments. Previous studies have employed various mathematical techniques to improve system performance. These include classic multivariate regression model (MLR) to incorporate ambient factors (e.g. temperature & relative humidity) and machine learning (ML) models for integrating complex non-linear sensor responses for gaseous pollutant concentration predictions. However, routine field calibrations may cause data inconsistency during measurement periods. This study first illustrates the limitations of short-term routine calibration by comparing performances of existing MLR and ML models. Further, based on a long-term evaluation period, a newly principle-based method named Temperature Look-Up (TLU) model was built and compared with the existing MLR and ML models. Measurements were taken for 8 months (August 2017 to March 2018) in SanMenXia (SMX) city, China, using 8 sets of sensor systems (Mini Air Stations, MAS). One MAS was co-located with AQMS to provide data to assess the principle, whereas the other 7 MAS were used for verification. The TLU model showed the best performance for long term validation (4 months) and high model inner coherence (R2 > 0.91). Meanwhile, the TLU model also shows the fast convergence (40 days) to reach stable prediction performance, and spatial representativeness in the sensor network. Recommendations on sensor network deployment and strategy for data maintenance based on our observations are discussed.

[1]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[2]  Shuhan Liu,et al.  Spatial-temporal variation characteristics of air pollution in Henan of China: Localized emission inventory, WRF/Chem simulations and potential source contribution analysis. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost commercially available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part B: NO, CO and CO2 , 2017 .

[4]  L. Morawska,et al.  The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. , 2015, Environment international.

[5]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide (cid:2) , 2022 .

[6]  G. Hagler,et al.  Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States. , 2016, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[7]  E. Snyder,et al.  The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[9]  Ashley Collier-Oxandale,et al.  Performance of artificial neural networks and linear models to quantify 4 trace gas species in an oil and gas production region with low-cost sensors , 2019, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

[10]  Michael P. Hannigan,et al.  Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[11]  David Hasenfratz,et al.  Statistical modelling of particle number concentration in Zurich at high spatio-temporal resolution utilizing data from a mobile sensor network , 2016 .

[12]  Olalekan Popoola,et al.  Development of a baseline-temperature correction methodology for electrochemical sensors and its implications for long-term stability , 2016 .

[13]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring , 2018 .

[15]  Gb Stewart,et al.  The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks , 2013 .

[16]  Alena Bartonova,et al.  Node-to-node field calibration of wireless distributed air pollution sensor network. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[17]  M. Hitchman,et al.  Study of the Factors Affecting Mass Transport in Electrochemical Gas Sensors , 1997 .

[18]  Grazia Ghermandi,et al.  Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[19]  Qijun Jiang,et al.  Field calibration of electrochemical NO 2 sensors in a citizen science context , 2018 .

[20]  Jianlin Hu,et al.  Air pollution characteristics and health risks in Henan Province, China , 2017, Environmental research.

[21]  Rafael Borge,et al.  Using statistical methods to carry out in field calibrations of low cost air quality sensors , 2018, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

[22]  S. Laurent,et al.  Protocol of evaluation and calibration of low-cost gas sensors for the monitoring of air pollution , 2013 .

[23]  Catherine Newman,et al.  The BErkeley Atmospheric CO 2 Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors , 2017 .

[24]  Ciprian Doru Giurcaneanu,et al.  Automated data scanning for dense networks of low-cost air quality instruments: Detection and differentiation of instrumental error and local to regional scale environmental abnormalities , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  Hao Huang,et al.  Development and Application of a Next Generation Air Sensor Network for the Hong Kong Marathon 2015 Air Quality Monitoring , 2016, Sensors.

[26]  Laurent Francis,et al.  Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise , 2016 .

[27]  Yu Wang,et al.  A Deep Learning Approach for Blind Drift Calibration of Sensor Networks , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[28]  Li Sun,et al.  Impact Analysis of Temperature and Humidity Conditions on Electrochemical Sensor Response in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[29]  Elena Esposito,et al.  Calibrating chemical multisensory devices for real world applications: An in-depth comparison of quantitative Machine Learning approaches , 2017, ArXiv.

[30]  J. Stetter,et al.  Amperometric gas sensors--a review. , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[31]  Nicola Masey,et al.  Temporal changes in field calibration relationships for Aeroqual S500 O3 and NO2 sensor-based monitors , 2018, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

[32]  Qingyang Xiao,et al.  An Ensemble Machine-Learning Model To Predict Historical PM2.5 Concentrations in China from Satellite Data. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.