Functional brain networks before the onset of psychosis: A prospective fMRI study with graph theoretical analysis☆☆☆

Individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) have a risk of developing a psychotic disorder significantly greater than the general population. However, it is not currently possible to predict which ARMS individuals will develop psychosis from clinical assessment alone. Comparison of ARMS subjects who do, and do not, develop psychosis can reveal which factors are critical for the onset of illness. In the present study, 37 patients with an ARMS were followed clinically at least 24 months subsequent to initial referral. Functional MRI data were collected at the beginning of the follow-up period during performance of an executive task known to recruit frontal lobe networks and to be impaired in psychosis. Graph theoretical analysis was used to compare the organization of a functional brain network in ARMS patients who developed a psychotic disorder following the scan (ARMS-T) to those who did not become ill during the same follow-up period (ARMS-NT) and aged-matched controls. The global properties of each group's representative network were studied (density, efficiency, global average path length) as well as regionally-specific contributions of network nodes to the organization of the system (degree, farness-centrality, betweenness-centrality). We focused our analysis on the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a region known to support executive function that is structurally and functionally impaired in ARMS patients. In the absence of between-group differences in global network organization, we report a significant reduction in the topological centrality of the ACC in the ARMS-T group relative to both ARMS-NT and controls. These results provide evidence that abnormalities in the functional organization of the brain predate the onset of psychosis, and suggest that loss of ACC topological centrality is a potential biomarker for transition to psychosis.

[1]  松岡 恵子,et al.  日本語版National Adult Reading Test(JART)の作成 , 2002 .

[2]  A. Yung,et al.  Can Clinicians Predict Psychosis in an Ultra High Risk Group? , 2010, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[3]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The relationship between regional and inter‐regional functional connectivity deficits in schizophrenia , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dysfunctional connectivity in schizophrenia. , 2002, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[6]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Disrupted Modularity and Local Connectivity of Brain Functional Networks in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[7]  G. Patton,et al.  Prediction of psychosis , 1998, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[8]  I. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  Hypofrontality in schizophrenia: a meta‐analysis of functional imaging studies , 2004, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[9]  Matthew J. Kempton,et al.  Neuroanatomy of vulnerability to psychosis: A voxel-based meta-analysis , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[10]  Yi-Ting Hwang,et al.  Comparisons of estimators of the number of true null hypotheses and adaptive FDR procedures in multiplicity testing , 2011 .

[11]  Fred W. Sabb,et al.  Language network dysfunction as a predictor of outcome in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis , 2010, Schizophrenia Research.

[12]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Decision-making under risk: A graph-based network analysis using functional MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  J. Rapoport,et al.  The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Philip K. McGuire,et al.  Characterization of the anterior cingulate's role in the at-risk mental state using graph theory , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Borgwardt,et al.  Cingulate volume abnormalities in emerging psychosis. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[19]  Paolo Fusar-Poli,et al.  Neurofunctional correlates of vulnerability to psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[21]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  P. McGuire,et al.  Cognitive Functioning in Prodromal Psychosis , 2012 .

[23]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  M. Kempton,et al.  Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk , 2013 .

[25]  Jong H. Yoon,et al.  General and Specific Functional Connectivity Disturbances in First-Episode Schizophrenia During Cognitive Control Performance , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Yury Shtyrov,et al.  Fast reconfiguration of high-frequency brain networks in response to surprising changes in auditory input. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Mcguire,et al.  Mapping prodromal psychosis: A critical review of neuroimaging studies , 2012, European Psychiatry.

[29]  P. McGuire,et al.  Abnormal frontostriatal interactions in people with prodromal signs of psychosis: a multimodal imaging study. , 2010, Archives of general psychiatry.

[30]  Hok Pan Yuen,et al.  Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk (“prodromal”) group , 2003, Schizophrenia Research.

[31]  John Suckling,et al.  For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. Kidney transplantation with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and sirolimus monotherapy , 2002 .

[32]  A. Egerton,et al.  Transition to psychosis associated with prefrontal and subcortical dysfunction in ultra high-risk individuals. , 2012, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[33]  Philip K. McGuire,et al.  Neural correlates of executive function and working memory in the ‘at-risk mental state’ , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[34]  J. Callicott,et al.  Dysfunctional and compensatory prefrontal cortical systems, genes and the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Dennis Velakoulis,et al.  Anatomic Abnormalities of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Before Psychosis Onset: An MRI Study of Ultra-High-Risk Individuals , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia , 2010 .

[37]  Paolo Fusar-Poli,et al.  At risk for schizophrenic or affective psychoses? A meta-analysis of DSM/ICD diagnostic outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. , 2013, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[38]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[39]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of different vulnerability states for psychosis and their clinical outcomes. , 2009, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[40]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Philip K. McGuire,et al.  Regional Gray Matter Volume Abnormalities in the At Risk Mental State , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[42]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Where are we now? , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[43]  M. Yücel,et al.  Early and Late Neurodevelopmental Disturbances in Schizophrenia and Their Functional Consequences , 2003, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[44]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Estimation of the Number of “True” Null Hypotheses in Multivariate Analysis of Neuroimaging Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[45]  A. Yung,et al.  The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. , 1996, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[46]  Liang Wang,et al.  Impaired Efficiency of Functional Networks Underlying Episodic Memory-for-Context in Schizophrenia , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  S. Kay,et al.  The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. , 1987, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[48]  T. McGlashan,et al.  Neuropsychological status of subjects at high risk for a first episode of psychosis , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[49]  P. McGuire,et al.  Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis. , 2012, Archives of general psychiatry.

[50]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Human Cortical Networks in Health and Schizophrenia , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[52]  Philip K. McGuire,et al.  Reductions in frontal, temporal and parietal volume associated with the onset of psychosis , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[53]  R. Heaton,et al.  Neurocognitive deficits in the (putative) prodrome and first episode of psychosis , 2007, Schizophrenia Research.

[54]  O. Sporns,et al.  Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks , 2008, Human brain mapping.