Gender effect in human brain responses to bottom-up and top-down attention using the EEG 3D-Vector Field Tomography

The effect of gender in rapidly allocating attention to objects, features or locations, as reflected in brain activity, is examined in this study. A visual-attention task, consisting of bottom-up (visual pop-out) and top-down (visual search) conditions during stimuli of four triangles, i.e., a target and three distractors, was engaged. In pop-out condition, both color and orientation of the distractors differed from target, while in search condition they differed only in orientation. During the task, high-density EEG (256 channels) data were recorded and analyzed by means of behavioral, event-related potentials, i.e., the P300 component and brain source localization analysis using 3D-Vector Field Tomography (3D-VFT). Twenty subjects (half female; 32±4.7 years old) participated in the experiments, performing 60 trials for each condition. Behavioral analysis revealed that both female and male outperformed in the pop-out condition compared to the search one, with respect to accuracy and reaction time, whereas no gender-related statistical significant differences were found. Nevertheless, in the search condition, higher P300 amplitudes were detected for females compared to males (p <; 7 · 10-3). Moreover, the findings suggested that the maximum activation in females was located mainly in the left inferior frontal and superior temporal gyri, whereas in males it was found in the right inferior frontal and superior temporal gyri. Overall, the experimental results show that visual attention depends on contributions from different brain lateralization linked to gender, posing important implications in studying developmental disorders, characterized by gender differences.

[1]  Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis,et al.  Tomographic Reconstruction of 3-D Irrotational Vector Fields via a Discretized Ray Transform , 2015, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[2]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[4]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[5]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load , 2007, Brain Research.

[6]  Rozmin Halari,et al.  Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual–spatial attention allocation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Neural correlates of age-related visual search decline: A combined ERP and sLORETA study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Knight,et al.  Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans , 2010, Brain Research.

[9]  E. Vaquero,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS DURING VISUAL-SPATIAL ATTENTION , 2004, The International journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging , 1998, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

[12]  N. Jausovec,et al.  Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks , 2009, Brain Research.

[13]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[15]  Mick Brammer,et al.  Sex-dependent age modulation of frontostriatal and temporo-parietal activation during cognitive control , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  D. E. Fleming,et al.  Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential , 2008, Vision Research.

[18]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  D. Collins,et al.  A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.