Aeroelastic optimization of a helicopter rotor using orthogonal array-based metamodels

Aeroelastic optimization of a four-bladed, soft-inplane hingeless rotor is performed to reduce hub loads and blade root loads with blade stiffness design variables. An aeroelastic analysis based on the finite element method is used. Aerodynamic modeling includes a time domain unsteady aerodynamic model and a free wake model. Metamodels (models of models) of the aeroelastic analysis are investigated in a systematic manner including various experimental designs such as factorial designs, central composite designs (CCD), gradient-enhanced CCD, and orthogonal arrays (OA). Linear, quadratic, and cubic polynomial response surfaces are obtained, and graphical, statistical, and optimization results obtained are used to compare the different designs. It is found that the CCD and OA are able to capture the basic trends of the analysis using sequential second-order polynomial response surfaces and are further investigated for use in optimization. However, the OA, which is a fractional factorial design, requires significantly fewer analysis runs than the CCD. Numerical results obtained for single-objective and multiobjective optimization problems show a 16‐22% reduction in vibratory hub loads for a nonuniform blade with six elastic stiffness design variables. The multiobjective optimization problem based on the min‐max method reduces the vibratory hub loads by about 16% and the 1/rev and 2/rev blade root loads, which are the principal cause of dynamic stresses, by about 18 and 31%, respectively. The OA-based metamodels provide an efficient and interactive approach to perform preliminary design studies using comprehensive simulation codes and is suitable for use in an industrial setting.

[1]  David H. Laananen,et al.  The Genetic Algorithm as an Automated Methodology for Helicopter Conceptual Design , 1997 .

[2]  Farhan Gandhi,et al.  Concurrently Optimized Aeroelastic Couplings and Rotor Stiffness for Alleviation of Helicopter Aeromechanical Instability , 2001 .

[3]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Semianalytical Sensitivity of Floquet Characteristic Exponents with Application to Rotary-Wing Aeroelasticity , 1996 .

[4]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Structural optimization with aeroelastic constraints of rotor blades with straight and swept tips , 1990 .

[5]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Rotary wing aeroelasticity - A historical perspective , 2003 .

[6]  L. Swiler,et al.  Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation , 2004 .

[7]  Unal Resit,et al.  Response Surface Model Building Using Orthogonal Arrays for Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[8]  Nesrin Sarigul-Klijn,et al.  Elastic-Dynamic Rotor Blade Design with Multiobjective Optimization , 2001 .

[9]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems , 2002 .

[10]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Efficient Treatment of Moderate Amplitude Constraints for Helicopter Handling Qualities Design Optimization , 1997 .

[11]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Structural optimization for vibratory loads reduction of composite helicopter rotor blades with advanced geometry tips , 1998 .

[12]  Ian Masters,et al.  Design optimisation of aluminium recycling processes using Taguchi technique , 2002 .

[13]  T. R. Mccarthy,et al.  A multidisciplinary optimization approach for vibration reduction in helicopter rotor blades , 1993 .

[14]  Hermann F. Fasel,et al.  Numerical investigation of the three-dimensional development in boundary-layer transition , 1987 .

[15]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Aeroelastic optimization of a helicopter rotor with composite coupling , 1995 .

[16]  Jongsoo Lee,et al.  Parallel Genetic Algorithm Implementation in Multidisciplinary Rotor Blade Design , 1996 .

[17]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Optimum design of rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight , 1984 .

[18]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  OPTIMUM DESIGN OF A HELICOPTER ROTOR FOR LOW VIBRATION USING AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS , 2002 .

[19]  Joanne L. Walsh,et al.  Optimization Methods Applied to the Aerodynamic Design of Helicopter Rotor Blades , 1987 .

[20]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[21]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Aeroelastic optimization of a helicopter rotor using an efficient sensitivity analysis , 1990 .

[22]  Robert G. Loewy,et al.  Helicopter Vibrations: A Technological Perspective , 1984 .

[23]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Active-Passive Hybrid Optimization of Rotor Blades With Trailing Edge Flaps , 2000 .

[24]  G. Reichert,et al.  Helicopter vibration control: a survey , 1980 .

[25]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  A new sensitivity analysis for structural optimization of composite rotor blades , 1993 .

[26]  R. Haftka,et al.  Response surface approximations for structural optimization , 1996 .

[27]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Design of experiments approach to helicopter rotor optimization , 2003 .

[28]  Martin K. Sekula,et al.  Helicopter Vibration Reduction Using Fixed-System Auxiliary Moments , 2002 .

[29]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Performance Enhancement of a Composite Tilt-Rotor Using Aeroelastic Tailoring , 2000 .

[30]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Aeroelastic Stability Enhancement and Vibration Suppression in a Composite Helicopter Rotor , 2005 .

[31]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Survey of Recent Developments in Rotorcraft Design Optimization , 2004 .

[32]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Using Gradients to Construct Response Surface Models for High-Dimensional Design Optimization Problems , 2001 .

[33]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  An optimization algorithm using orthogonal arrays in discrete design space for structures , 2003 .

[34]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Vibration reduction in rotorcraft using active control - A comparison of various approaches , 1995 .

[35]  T. R. Bement,et al.  Taguchi techniques for quality engineering , 1995 .

[36]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[37]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis for Helicopter Flight Dynamic and Aeromechanic Stability , 2003 .

[38]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Aeroelastic optimization of an advanced geometry helicopter rotor , 1992 .

[39]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[40]  J. H. Starnes,et al.  Construction of Response Surface Approximations for Design Optimization , 1998 .

[41]  K. W. Wang,et al.  An optimal actuator placement methodology for active control of helicopter airframe vibrations , 2001 .