Scaling measurement experiments to planet-scale: ethical, regulatory and cultural considerations

Conducting planet-scale mobility experiments and measurements is of great interest to network researchers for building the next generation of wireless networking technologies, or for studying inter-disciplinary problems in complex networks. There are many technical challenges that need to be addressed before such experiments can take place. But at the same time, there are many non-technical issues that need to be tackled in order to preserve the welfare of participants in these studies. While some of these issues have been addressed in previous small-scale studies, they become increasingly complex when differences between countries need to be taken into account. This position paper highlights some of these issues and argues that they need to be addressed before planet-scale measurement experiments can be conducted. We discuss ethical, regulatory, cultural and privacy issues, and consider how to design measurement systems that will scale up to planet-wide experiments. We motivate our approach by discussing work in measurement of mobile and online social networks.

[1]  Vitaly Shmatikov,et al.  The cost of privacy: destruction of data-mining utility in anonymized data publishing , 2008, KDD.

[2]  Abe Singer Conference Password Sniffing: Legal and Ethical Issues , 2005, login Usenix Mag..

[3]  Charles Ess,et al.  Ethical Approaches to Robotic Data Gathering in Academic Research , 2008 .

[4]  Priscilla M. Regan Safe Harbors or Free Frontiers? Privacy and Transborder Data Flows , 2003 .

[5]  Rita Walczuch,et al.  Implications of the new EU Directive on data protection for multinational corporations , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[6]  Genevieve Bell,et al.  The age of the thumb: A cultural reading of mobile technologies from Asia , 2005, Thumb Culture.

[7]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Shakra: Tracking and Sharing Daily Activity Levels with Unaugmented Mobile Phones , 2007, Mob. Networks Appl..

[8]  Klemens Böhm,et al.  Privacy2.0: Towards Collaborative Data-Privacy Protection , 2008, IFIPTM.

[9]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application , 2008, SenSys '08.

[10]  Fehmi Ben Abdesslem,et al.  Less is more: energy-efficient mobile sensing with senseless , 2009, MobiHeld '09.

[11]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Location and Mobility in a Sensor Network of Mobile Phones , 2007 .

[12]  Dan Suciu,et al.  The Boundary Between Privacy and Utility in Data Publishing , 2007, VLDB.

[13]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Christophe Diot,et al.  Impact of Human Mobility on Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[15]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  User-centered System Design , 2011 .

[16]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  Measuring wireless network usage with the Experience Sampling Method , 2005 .

[17]  Joachim Höflich,et al.  The mobile phone and the dynamic between private and public communication: Results of an international exploratory study , 2005, Thumb Culture.

[18]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  WatchMe: Communication and Awareness Between Members of a Closely-Knit Group , 2004, UbiComp.

[19]  Margaret Jackson,et al.  Transborder Data Protection and the Effects on Business and Government , 2007, HCI.

[20]  J. Borges,et al.  A TAXONOMY OF PRIVACY , 2006 .

[21]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Opportunistic content distribution in an urban setting , 2006, CHANTS '06.

[23]  Adam P. Warren,et al.  Data protection legislation in the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[24]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  CRAWDAD: a community resource for archiving wireless data at Dartmouth , 2005, CCRV.