Interpolating Seismic Data With Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks

Having dense and regularly sampled data is becoming increasingly important in seismic processing. However, due to physical or financial constraints, seismic data sets can be often undersampled. Occasionally, these data sets may also present bad or dead traces the geoscientist must deal with. Many works have tackled this problem using prestack data and can be classified in three main categories: wave-equation, domain transform, and prediction-error-filter methods. In this letter, we assess the performance of a conditional generative adversarial network for the interpolation problem in poststack seismic data sets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to evaluate a deep learning approach in this context. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of our experiments indicate that deep networks may present an interesting alternative to classical methods.

[1]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[2]  Yibo Wang,et al.  Interferometric interpolation of missing seismic data , 2009 .

[3]  Ali Özbek,et al.  Interpolation By Matching Pursuit , 2009 .

[4]  S. M. Doherty,et al.  Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data , 2000 .

[5]  Peter Hubral,et al.  An Introduction to the Common Reflection Surface Stack , 1998 .

[6]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  R. Abma,et al.  3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm , 2006 .

[8]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Two dimensional shot‐profile migration data reconstruction , 2010 .

[9]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Minimum Weighted Norm Interpolation of Seismic Data With Adaptive Weights , 2001 .

[10]  Necati Gulunay,et al.  Unaliased F-k Domain Trace Interpolation (UFKI) , 1996 .

[11]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Beyond alias hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of regularly and irregularly sampled seismic data , 2010 .

[12]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  An Algorithm for Interpolation in the Pyramid Domain , 2009 .

[13]  L. P. Van Leeuwen,et al.  The Reconstruction of Missing Marine Seismic Data , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[15]  S. Spitz Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain , 1991 .

[16]  Necati Gulunay,et al.  Seismic trace interpolation in the Fourier transform domain , 2003 .

[17]  Robert H. Stolt,et al.  Seismic data mapping and reconstruction , 2002 .

[18]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Seismic reflection data interpolation with differential offset and shot continuation , 2003 .

[19]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of primaries and near-offset reconstruction by sparse inversion: Marine data applications , 2009 .

[20]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Focal transformation, an imaging concept for signal restoration and noise removal , 2006 .