Microfluidic Control of Cell Pairing and Fusion

Cell fusion has been used for many different purposes, including generation of hybridomas and reprogramming of somatic cells. The fusion step is the key event in initiation of these procedures. Standard fusion techniques, however, provide poor and random cell contact, leading to low yields. We present here a microfluidic device to trap and properly pair thousands of cells. Using this device, we paired different cell types, including fibroblasts, mouse embryonic stem cells and myeloma cells, achieving pairing efficiencies up to 70%. The device is compatible with both chemical and electrical fusion protocols. We observed that electrical fusion was more efficient than chemical fusion, with membrane reorganization efficiencies of up to 89%. We achieved greater than 50% properly paired and fused cells over the entire device, fivefold greater than with a commercial electrofusion chamber and observed reprogramming in hybrids between mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

[1]  C. Milstein,et al.  Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity , 1975, Nature.

[2]  G. Pontecorvo,et al.  Production of mammalian somatic cell hybrids by means of polyethylene glycol treatment , 1975, Somatic cell genetics.

[3]  Frank H. Ruddle,et al.  Pluripotent teratocarcinoma-thymus somatic cell hybrids , 1976, Cell.

[4]  R. Davidson,et al.  Improved techniques for the induction of mammalian cell hybridization by polyethylene glycol , 1976, Somatic cell genetics.

[5]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric field‐induced fusion: electro‐hydraulic procedure for production of heterokaryon cells in high yield , 1982, FEBS letters.

[6]  Characterization of electric field-induced fusion in erythrocyte ghost membranes , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  H. Blau,et al.  Plasticity of the differentiated state. , 1985, Science.

[8]  T. B. Bakker Schut,et al.  Selective electrofusion of conjugated cells in flow. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[9]  I. Wilmut,et al.  "Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells" (1997), by Ian Wilmut et al. , 2014 .

[10]  M. Surani,et al.  Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[11]  A. G. Shilov,et al.  In vitro and in vivo study of pluripotency in intraspecific hybrid cells obtained by fusion of murine embryonic stem cells with splenocytes , 1998, Molecular reproduction and development.

[12]  R N Zare,et al.  Manipulating the genetic identity and biochemical surface properties of individual cells with electric-field-induced fusion. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Norio Nakatsuji,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells , 2001, Current Biology.

[14]  Thorsten Lang,et al.  Membrane fusion. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[15]  Penny A. Johnson,et al.  Reprogramming in inter-species embryonal carcinoma-somatic cell hybrids induces expression of pluripotency and differentiation markers. , 2003, Cloning and stem cells.

[16]  Guillaume Tresset,et al.  A Microfluidic Device for Electrofusion of Biological Vesicles , 2004, 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Maastricht MEMS 2004 Technical Digest.

[17]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  A single cell electroporation chip. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Microfluidic application-specific integrated device for monitoring direct cell-cell communication via gap junctions between individual cell pairs , 2005 .

[19]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric field-induced cell-to-cell fusion , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[20]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Single-cell enzyme concentrations, kinetics, and inhibition analysis using high-density hydrodynamic cell isolation arrays. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion , 2006, Nature.

[22]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[23]  Chang Lu,et al.  Microfluidic cell fusion under continuous direct current voltage , 2006 .

[24]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2007, Nature.

[25]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Single-cell electroporation arrays with real-time monitoring and feedback control. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[26]  Joel Voldman,et al.  Cell patterning chip for controlling the stem cell microenvironment. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[27]  Ciprian Iliescu,et al.  Electrical control of loaded biomimetic femtoliter vesicles in microfluidic system , 2007 .

[28]  M. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  High-Efficiency Stem Cell Fusion-Mediated Assay Reveals Sall4 as an Enhancer of Reprogramming , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  A. van den Berg,et al.  Gene transfer and protein dynamics in stem cells using single cell electroporation in a microfluidic device. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[30]  Owe Orwar,et al.  Single-cell electroporation , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.