Processing Fluency in Education: How Metacognitive Feelings Shape Learning, Belief Formation, and Affect

Processing fluency—the experienced ease with which a mental operation is performed—has attracted little attention in educational psychology, despite its relevance. The present article reviews and integrates empirical evidence on processing fluency that is relevant to school education. Fluency is important, for instance, in learning, self-assessment of knowledge, testing, grading, teacher–student communication, social interaction in the multicultural classroom, and emergence of interest. After a brief overview of basic fluency research we review effects of processing fluency in three broad areas: metacognition in learning, belief formation, and affect. Within each area, we provide evidence-based implications for education. Along the way, we offer fluency-based insights into phenomena that were long known but not yet sufficiently explained (e.g., the effect of handwriting on grading). Bringing fluency (back) to education may contribute to research and school practice alike.

[1]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study , 2022 .

[3]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .

[4]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Interest, Learning, and Motivation , 1991 .

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Two to tango: Automatic social coordination and the role of felt effort , 2010 .

[6]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  H. W. James The Effect of Handwriting upon Grading , 1927 .

[8]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  Synchrony and Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[9]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning , 2008, Science.

[10]  Bridgid Finn,et al.  Ending on a high note: adding a better end to effortful study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  The negative suggestion effect: Pondering incorrect alternatives may be hazardous to your knowledge. , 1999 .

[12]  E. S. Battle MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ACADEMIC TASK PERSISTENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Marianne LaFrance,et al.  Group Rapport: Posture Sharing as a Nonverbal Indicator , 1976 .

[14]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[15]  Emmanuel Chasseigne,et al.  (Almost) Everything you always wanted to know about deterministic control problems in stratified domains , 2015, Networks Heterog. Media.

[16]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[19]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[20]  Sarah K. Tauber,et al.  When Confidence Is Not a Signal of Knowing: How Students’ Experiences and Beliefs About Processing Fluency Can Lead to Miscalibrated Confidence , 2015 .

[21]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.

[22]  Fred Paas,et al.  Remembered Utility of Unpleasant and Pleasant Learning Experiences: Is All Well that Ends Well? , 2012 .

[23]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[24]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized): effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. , 2011, Cognition.

[25]  T. Jong Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[26]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Easy on the eyes, or hard to categorize: Classification difficulty decreases the appeal of facial blends , 2014 .

[27]  B. Finn,et al.  Hitting a high note on math tests: Remembered success influences test preferences. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  The Interpersonal Consequences of Processing Ease , 2015 .

[30]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making , 2013 .

[31]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[32]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Easing in: Fluent processing brings others into the ingroup , 2012 .

[33]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Fostering adolescents' value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. , 2015, Developmental psychology.

[35]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? , 2014 .

[36]  Allison J. Jaeger,et al.  If it’s hard to read, it changes how long you do it: Reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Dissociating Knowing and the Feeling of Knowing : Further Evidence for the Accessibility Model , 2005 .

[38]  Fred Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Measuring Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[39]  A. Efklides Metacognition and Affect: What Can Metacognitive Experiences Tell Us about the Learning Process?. , 2006 .

[40]  D. Oyserman Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making , 2011 .

[41]  C. S. White,et al.  Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children , 1989 .

[42]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Less Is Sometimes More: Goal Content Matters , 2004 .

[43]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[45]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. , 1975 .

[46]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[48]  M. Garry,et al.  Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  C. A. Sanchez,et al.  Instructor accents in online education and their effect on learning and attitudes , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[51]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[54]  William H. McNeill,et al.  Keeping Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. , 1995 .

[55]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[56]  J. Wiley,et al.  An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[58]  A. Castel,et al.  Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  B. Skinner,et al.  The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis , 2016 .

[60]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[61]  N. Schwarz,et al.  How Pleasant Was Your Childhood? Beliefs About Memory Shape Inferences From Experienced Difficulty of Recall , 2001, Psychological science.

[62]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  TURNING LIES INTO TRUTHS : REFERENTIAL VALIDATION OF FALSEHOODS , 1996 .

[63]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[64]  J. Dixon,et al.  Accents of Guilt? , 2002 .

[65]  A Koriat,et al.  The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  R. Reber,et al.  Effects of processing fluency on comparative performance judgments. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[67]  Robert H. Ennis A Concept of Critical Thinking. , 1962 .

[68]  Nel Noddings,et al.  Happiness and Education , 2003 .

[69]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[70]  A. Graesser,et al.  Confusion can be beneficial for learning. , 2014 .

[71]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  Towards a better understanding of the legibility bias in performance assessments: the case of gender-based inferences. , 2012, The British journal of educational psychology.

[72]  Daniel C Molden,et al.  Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  J. Schweppe,et al.  Fortune is fickle: null-effects of disfluency on learning outcomes , 2016 .

[74]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[75]  E. Bjork,et al.  Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. , 2011 .

[76]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[77]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[78]  Daniela Wong Gonzalez,et al.  Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related , 2017 .

[79]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[80]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart) , 2003 .

[81]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[83]  R. Crisp,et al.  A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants , 2010 .

[84]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  The psychology of academic achievement. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[86]  R. Reber,et al.  The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth , 2010, Review of philosophy and psychology.

[87]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly , 2006 .

[88]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  On Writing Legibly , 2010 .

[89]  Neil W Mulligan,et al.  Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[90]  Luke A. Buckland,et al.  Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .

[91]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[92]  R. Reber,et al.  Immediate truth – Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution , 2010, Cognition.

[93]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions , 1988 .

[94]  Ian Begg,et al.  Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth , 1992 .

[95]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The persistence of the fluency–confidence association in problem solving , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[96]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[97]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains , 2010 .

[98]  Teal S Eich,et al.  Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[99]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople’s reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information , 2012 .

[100]  H. AndresMartinM.D.M.P. Happiness and Education. , 2005 .

[101]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Fortune favors the ( ): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes , 2011, Cognition.

[102]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Different clues from different views: The role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[103]  J. Dewey,et al.  Interest and Effort in Education , 1975 .

[104]  The experience of thinking : how the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour , 2013 .

[105]  R. Mayer,et al.  The Role of Interest in Learning From Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest , 1997 .

[106]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[107]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[108]  B. Keysar,et al.  Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility , 2010 .

[109]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[110]  Ian Skurnik,et al.  Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns , 2007 .

[111]  Elizabeth J Marsh,et al.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[112]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .

[113]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[114]  A Koriat,et al.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993, Psychological review.

[115]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[116]  Denise C. Park,et al.  How warnings about false claims become recommendations , 2005 .

[117]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[118]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[119]  D. Barr,et al.  Self-anchoring in conversation: Why language users do not do what they 'should' , 2002 .

[120]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[121]  R. Mayer Illustrations That Instruct , 2019, Advances in Instructional Psychology.

[122]  C. Dweck,et al.  Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[123]  R. Alfaro-LeFevre Critical thinking. , 1997, Nursing spectrum.

[124]  J. H. Faris The Impact of Basic Combat Training , 1975 .

[125]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[126]  Veronica X. Yan,et al.  On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[127]  R. Reber,et al.  Effects of Example Choice on Interest, Control, and Learning , 2009 .

[128]  Christian Unkelbach,et al.  The Learned Interpretation of Cognitive Fluency , 2006, Psychological science.

[129]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[130]  J T Hart,et al.  Second-try recall, recognition, and the memory-monitoring process. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[131]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[132]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning , 2005 .

[133]  A. Johnstone Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[134]  Boaz Keysar,et al.  The Foreign-Language Effect , 2012, Psychological science.

[135]  Chris S. Hulleman,et al.  Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes , 2009, Science.

[136]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Children's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. , 2013, Child development.

[137]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  The experience of thinking : how the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour , 2013 .

[138]  Tessa V. West,et al.  The Fragility of Intergroup Relations , 2008, Psychological science.

[139]  A. Efklides Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model , 2011 .

[140]  Ann L. Brown Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[141]  D. Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Creating Illusions of Familiarity in a Cued Recall Remember/Know Paradigm , 1996 .

[142]  Justin Dillon,et al.  Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education , 2015 .

[143]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning , 2008, Cognition.

[144]  R. Mcneely,et al.  The Truth About , 2016 .

[145]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .

[146]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  FLUENCY AND THE DETECTION OF MISLEADING QUESTIONS : LOW PROCESSING FLUENCY ATTENUATES THE MOSES ILLUSION , 2008 .

[147]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[148]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. , 1978 .

[149]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[150]  Dennis Briggs,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF HANDWRITING ON ASSESSMENT , 1970 .

[151]  A. Efklides,et al.  Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control , 1999 .

[152]  Marko Dragojevic,et al.  I Don't Like You Because You're Hard to Understand: The Role of Processing Fluency in the Language Attitudes Process , 2016 .

[153]  Deborah Bybee,et al.  Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[154]  V. Aleven,et al.  Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments , 2014 .

[155]  David Weltman,et al.  Incorporating Unusual Fonts and Planned Mistakes in Study Materials to Increase Business Student Focus and Retention , 2014, INFORMS Trans. Educ..

[156]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control , 2002 .

[157]  Scott Sainato Pathways to Success through Identity-Based Motivation , 2016 .

[158]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Adult Egocentrism: Subjective Experience versus Analytic Bases for Judgment , 1996 .

[159]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[160]  J. D. Trout Seduction without cause: uncovering explanatory neurophilia , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[161]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  Guiding trustful behavior: The role of accessible content and accessibility experiences , 2011 .

[162]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  Relying on accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity , 2007 .

[163]  Rita R. Silva,et al.  Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later , 2015 .

[164]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment , 2002 .

[165]  Paul R. Ford,et al.  How experts practice: a novel test of deliberate practice theory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[166]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[167]  J. Kruger Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[168]  H. H. Remmers,et al.  The negative suggestion effect on true-false examination questions. , 1926 .

[169]  R. Bjork,et al.  Metacognition in motor learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[170]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[171]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Discovering Emotion in Classroom Motivation Research , 2002 .

[172]  B. Tuck,et al.  Effects of Achievement Expectations and Handwriting Quality on Scoring Essays. , 1983 .

[173]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[174]  A. Koriat,et al.  Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[175]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[176]  L R Squire,et al.  Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[177]  B. Finn,et al.  Does Easily Learned Mean Easily Remembered? , 2011, Psychological science.

[178]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking , 2013, Cognition.

[179]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[180]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[181]  Rico Fischer,et al.  If it’s hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments , 2011, Psychological research.

[182]  Ty W. Boyer,et al.  Disfluent fonts don't help people solve math problems. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[183]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  The effect of instructor fluency on students' perceptions of instructors, confidence in learning, and actual learning. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[184]  R. Bjork,et al.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[185]  S. Klassen,et al.  The Role of Interest in Learning Science through Stories , 2014 .

[186]  L. R. Markham,et al.  Influences of Handwriting Quality on Teacher Evaluation of Written Work1 , 1976 .

[187]  Miri Besken Picture-perfect is not perfect for metamemory: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with degraded images. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[188]  Tricia Broadfoot Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture , 1978 .

[189]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[190]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[191]  N. Schwarz Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[192]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[193]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[194]  John Sweller,et al.  Measuring cognitive load , 2018, Perspectives on Medical Education.

[195]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Judgments of Learning , 2016 .

[196]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[197]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences: The Interplay of Declarative and Experiential Information in Judgment , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[198]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[199]  D. Kahneman,et al.  When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End , 1993 .