On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: I. Stop-signal studies of decision and memory.

In six experiments, subjects made speeded category and rhyme judgments about pairs of words and were occasionally asked to inhibit their responses. At issue was whether thoughts stop when the corresponding actions are inhibited. The extent to which thoughts were completed was assessed from memory for the words presented in the orienting tasks. Experiments 1 and 2 suggested that thoughts were not inhibited with their corresponding actions: Memory for words whose responses were inhibited was not different from memory for words whose responses were not inhibited, and memory performance did not vary,with stop-signal delay (i.e., the time between the onset of the. word pair and the onset of the stop signal). The same results were obtained in Experiments 3 and 4, though subjects made an overt response to the stop signal (tone) when it occurred. In Experiments 5 and 6, the display changed when the stop signal sounded, and the data suggested that thoughts were inhibited with their actions: Memory for words whose responses were inhibited was much worse than memory for words whose responses were not inhibited, and memory performance improved substantially as stop-signal delay increased. It was concluded that simple thoughts run on to completion whether or not the corresponding action is inhibited, provided that the stimuli that drive the thoughts are not disrupted before the thoughts finish.

[1]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. , 1982 .

[2]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[3]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[4]  G. Logan,et al.  On the Use of a Concurrent Memory Load to Measure Attention and Automaticity , 1979 .

[5]  G. Logan Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. , 1978 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[7]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Effect of mean reaction time on saccadic responses to two-step stimuli with horizontal and vertical components , 1975, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[9]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Recall and recognition as a function of primary rehearsal. , 1973 .

[10]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[11]  D. Rundus Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. , 1971 .

[12]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[13]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. , 1966 .

[15]  B. Murdock,et al.  A TEST OF THE "LIMITED CAPACITY" HYPOTHESIS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[17]  M. Wallach,et al.  Recall of interrupted tasks under stress: a phenomenon of memory or of learning. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  A. Marrow Goal Tensions and Recall: I , 1938 .

[19]  A. Pachauri A STUDY OF GESTALT PROBLEMS IN COMPLETED AND INTERRUPTED TASKS: PART III , 1936 .

[20]  G. Logan Short-Term Memory Demands of Reaction-Time Tasks That Differ in Complexity , 1980 .

[21]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  On the nature of metacontrast with complex targets and masks. , 1977 .

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[23]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[24]  W. Johnston,et al.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  A. Pachauri A STUDY OF GESTALT PROBLEMS IN COMPLETED AND INTERRUPTED TASKS , 1935 .