Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Variations in the spectral shape of harmonic tone complexes are perceived as timbre changes and can lead to poorer fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch discrimination. Less is known about the effects of F0 variations on spectral shape discrimination. The aims of the study were to determine whether the interactions between pitch and timbre are symmetric, and to test whether musical training affects listeners' ability to ignore variations in irrelevant perceptual dimensions. Difference limens (DLs) for F0 were measured with and without random, concurrent, variations in spectral centroid, and vice versa. Additionally, sensitivity was measured as the target parameter and the interfering parameter varied by the same amount, in terms of individual DLs. Results showed significant and similar interference between pitch (F0) and timbre (spectral centroid) dimensions, with upward spectral motion often confused for upward F0 motion, and vice versa. Musicians had better F0DLs than non-musicians on average, but similar spectral centroid DLs. Both groups showed similar interference effects, in terms of decreased sensitivity, in both dimensions. Results reveal symmetry in the interference effects between pitch and timbre, once differences in sensitivity between dimensions and subjects are controlled. Musical training does not reliably help to overcome these effects.

[1]  Ken Robinson.  Brightness and octave position: are changes in spectral envelope and in tone height perceptually equivalent? , 1993 .

[2]  E. M. Burns.  Intervals, Scales, and Tuning , 1999 .

[3]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. , 2007, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. McAdams,et al.  Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P Iverson,et al.  Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[9]  S. S. Stevens.  Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. , 1972 .

[10]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[11]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination , 2006, Hearing Research.

[12]  L E Marks,et al.  Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  A. Faulkner.  Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: residue pitch or multiple component discriminations? , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Is Relative Pitch Specific to Pitch? , 2022 .

[15]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Music Perception, Pitch, and the Auditory System This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Sensory Systems Edited Pitch Relations across Time—relative Pitch Relative Pitch—behavioral Evidence Neural Mechanisms of Relative Pitch Representation of Simultaneous Pitches— Chords and Polyphony Summary and , 2022 .

[16]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  I. Peretz,et al.  The amusic brain: in tune, out of key, and unaware. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  W. Thompson,et al.  An interval size illusion: The influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Frisina,et al.  Neural processing of musical timbre by musicians, nonmusicians, and musicians possessing absolute pitch. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Shepard.  Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. , 1982, Psychological review.

[21]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Robert J Zatorre,et al.  Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch , 2002, Perception & Psychophysics.

[23]  R. Melara,et al.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Informational masking and musical training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B C Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R. Melara,et al.  Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[29]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  G. Soete,et al.  Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes , 1995, Psychological research.

[31]  J. Grey.  Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J. Townsend,et al.  Independence and separability in the perception of complex nonspeech sounds , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Catherine Semal,et al.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  M A Pitt.  Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  A. Beal,et al.  The skill of recognizing musical structures , 1985, Memory & cognition.