Deterministic and Probabilistic Conflict Detection Algorithms for NextGen Airport Surface Operations

The paper deals with the development a ground-side conflict detection automation system for NextGen airport surface operations. The automation system is referred to as “Monitor Airport Environment: Surface Traffic and Runway Operations (MAESTRO).” In contrast to current-day conflict detection systems, MAESTRO has been designed taking into account NextGen operational concepts from mid-term and far-term timeframes. Conflicts of interest are Taxiway Collisions and Runway Incursions. A new conflict alert referred to as “Runway Incursion Situation Alert (RISA)” is created to actively prevent runway incursions. The automation system is driven by surveillance inputs and the outputs from airport planning systems such as Spot and Runway Departure Advisor (SARDA). MAESTRO consists of three modules: (i) Trajectory Prediction module, (ii) Conflict Detection module, and (iii) Controller Display module. The trajectory prediction module generates the 4D-trajectory predictions along with their uncertainty estimates. The paper develops the framework for both deterministic and probabilistic conflict detection. MEASTRO has been tested using actual surface traffic data from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW). The evaluations indicate promising performance with zero missed-alerts and few false alarms that are actually close encounters. It is shown that situations which could potentially become Runway Incursions could be detected as RISAs with a lead-time of 60 seconds.

[1]  V. Capezzuto,et al.  Runway incursion reduction program (RIRP) surveillance system, NASA/FAA Atlanta demonstration , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[2]  Anthony D. Andre,et al.  Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System: Problem, Design Philosophy, and Description of an Integrated Display Suite for Low-Visibility Airport Surface Operations , 1996 .

[3]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  A Concept and Implementation of Optimized Operations of Airport Surface Traffic , 2010 .

[4]  Denise R. Jones,et al.  Collision avoidance for airport traffic concept evaluation , 2009, 2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[5]  Denise R. Jones,et al.  Initial Concept for Terminal Area Conflict Detection, Alerting, and Resolution Capability On or Near the Airport Surface, Version 2.0 , 2013 .

[6]  Sai Vaddi,et al.  Air-Ground Integrated Concept for Surface Conflict Detection and Resolution , 2012 .

[7]  Barbara G. Kanki,et al.  An Evaluation of the Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System in High-Fidelity Simulation , 1998 .

[8]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  A Mixed Integer Linear Program for Airport Departure Scheduling , 2009 .

[9]  D. R. Jones,et al.  Runway incursion prevention system-demonstration and testing at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[10]  Maria Picardi Kuffner,et al.  Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights , 2006 .

[11]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Collision Avoidance for Airport Traffic simulation evaluation , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[12]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  Managing departure aircraft release for efficient airport surface operations , 2010 .

[13]  Victor H. L. Cheng,et al.  Concept and Requirements for Airport Surface Conflict Detection and Resolution , 2011 .

[14]  J. W. Ianniello,et al.  Airport surface collision warning system implementation , 1993, [1993 Proceedings] AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[15]  V.H.L. Cheng Collaborative automation systems for enhancing airport surface traffic efficiency and safety , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[16]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  Incorporating Active Runway Crossings in Airport Departure Scheduling , 2010 .

[17]  Denise R. Jones,et al.  Simulator Evaluation of Runway Incursion Prevention Technology for General Aviation Operations , 2011 .

[18]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Benefits of Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) , 2005 .