Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid System Application for Unilateral Congenital Conductive Hearing Impairment: Audiometric Results

Objective: To study the audiologic outcome of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) application in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing impairment. Study Design: Prospective audiometric evaluation on 20 patients. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: The experimental group comprised 20 consecutive patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing impairment, with a mean air-bone gap of 50 dB. Methods: Aided and unaided hearing was assessed using sound localization and speech recognition-in-noise tests. Results: Aided hearing thresholds and aided speech perception thresholds were measured to verify the effect of the BAHA system on the hearing acuity. All patients fulfilled the criteria that the aided speech reception thresholds or the mean aided sound field thresholds were 25 dB or better in the aided situation. Most patients were still using the BAHA almost every day. Sound localization scores varied widely in the unaided and aided situations. Many patients showed unexpectedly good unaided performance. However, nonsignificant improvements of 3.0 (500 Hz) and 6.9 degrees (3,000 Hz) were observed in favor of the BAHA. Speech recognition in noise with spatially separated speech and noise sources also improved after BAHA implantation, but not significantly. Conclusion: Some patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing impairment had such good directional hearing and speech-in-noise scores in the unaided situation that no overall significant improvement occurred after BAHA fitting in our setup. Of the 18 patients with a complete data set, 6 did not show any significant improvement at all. However, compliance with BAHA use in this patient group was remarkably high. Observations of consistent use of the device are highly suggestive of patient benefit. Further research is recommended to get more insight into these findings.

[1]  Peder Carlsson,et al.  Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[2]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  R. Jönsson,et al.  Audiological evaluation and self-assessed hearing problems in subjects with single-sided congenital external ear malformations and associated conductive hearing loss , 2007, International journal of audiology.

[4]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Andy J. Beynon,et al.  Binaural Application of the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  A. Snik,et al.  Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid in Unilateral Inner Ear Deafness: A Study of 20 Patients , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  C. Cremers,et al.  Classification of congenital aural atresia and results of reconstructive surgery. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[8]  Emmanuel A.M. Mylanus,et al.  Does the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Have a Complementary Effect on Audiological and Subjective Outcomes in Patients with Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss? , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  Lincoln Gray,et al.  Binaural processing after corrected congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss , 1994, Hearing Research.

[10]  J. Wazen,et al.  Results of the Bone‐Anchored Hearing Aid in Unilateral Hearing Loss , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  A. Snik,et al.  Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies , 1994, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  A. Snik,et al.  The Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid in Patients with a Unilateral Air-Bone Gap , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.