Commentary: Predictors of outcomes after corneal collagen cross linking: Present, and future directions

Corneal collagen -cross-linking (CXL) as we know is a procedure to enhance the biomechanical strength of the cornea, thereby, halting the progression of corneal weakening in Keratoconus (KC). CXL has been in vogue for around two decades now, and along with newer contact lens developments, it has helped considerably in reducing the rates of keratoplasty. CXL is known to have complications such as post-CXL haze or scar, sterile infiltrates, failure, excessive flattening, and endothelial damage, among a few others. A lot of cornea practices across the world are confidently performing CXL as these complications are relatively low. However, in this upcoming era of personalized medicine, there are still a lot of unanswered questions about CXL. Predicting which kind of patients are likely to develop a haze or scarring or excessive or no flattening or failure post-CXL is not possible yet. We do not have the ability to predict the outcomes or complications after CXL to personalize care for different patients.

[1]  T. C. Chan,et al.  Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: Five-year results and predictors of visual and topographic outcomes , 2022, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  R. Shetty,et al.  Impact of tear optics on the repeatability of Pentacam AXL wave and iTrace in measuring anterior segment parameters and aberrations , 2022, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  R. Shetty,et al.  Repeatability and Agreement of a New Scheimpflug Device and a Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer With a Ray-Tracing Aberrometer in Normal, Keratoconus, and CXL Groups. , 2022, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  R. Shetty,et al.  Biochemical and molecular alterations and potential clinical applications of biomarkers in keratoconus , 2022, Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society.

[5]  B. Kurtul,et al.  Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio levels are associated with keratoconus , 2021, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Stephen J. Vincent,et al.  The effect of scleral lenses on vision, refraction and aberrations in post‐LASIK ectasia, keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration , 2021, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  W. Hatch,et al.  Central versus paracentral cone location and outcomes of accelerated cross-linking in keratoconus patients , 2021, Eye.

[8]  Sneha Gupta,et al.  Epithelial remodelling masquerading as keratoconus progression: An interesting case report , 2020, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  C. Grupcheva,et al.  Metabolomic analysis in ophthalmology. , 2020, Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.

[10]  Christoph K. Hitzenberger,et al.  Ultrahigh Resolution Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography of the Human Cornea with Conical Scanning Pattern and Variable Dispersion Compensation , 2019, Applied sciences.

[11]  K. Nischal,et al.  Pediatric corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: not an experimental procedure. , 2019, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[12]  B. Ambati,et al.  IVMED-80 Eye Drops for Treatment of Keratoconus , 2018 .

[13]  V. Abilash,et al.  Outcomes of Corneal Cross-Linking Correlate With Cone-Specific Lysyl Oxidase Expression in Patients With Keratoconus , 2017, Cornea.

[14]  Harsha L Rao,et al.  Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug-based and slit-scanning imaging devices , 2017, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  C. Jayadev,et al.  Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  S. Smallbone,et al.  Outcomes of , 2010 .