Older Adults’ Perspectives of Smart Technologies to Support Aging at Home: Insights from Five World Café Forums

Globally, there is an urgent need for solutions that can support our aging populations to live well and reduce the associated economic, social and health burdens. Implementing smart technologies within homes and communities may assist people to live well and ‘age in place’. To date, there has been little consultation with older Australians addressing either the perceived benefits, or the potential social and ethical challenges associated with smart technology use. To address this, we conducted five World Cafés in two Australian states, aiming to capture citizen knowledge about the possibilities and challenges of smart technologies. The participants (n = 84) were aged 55 years and over, English-speaking, and living independently. Grounding our analysis in values-based social science and biomedical ethical principles, we identified the themes reflecting the participants’ understanding, resistance, and acceptance of smart technologies, and the ethical principles, including beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, privacy, confidentiality, and justice. Similar to other studies, many of the participants demonstrated cautious and conditional acceptance of smart technologies, while identifying concerns about social isolation, breaches of privacy and confidentiality, surveillance, and stigmatization. Attention to understanding and incorporating the values of older citizens will be important for the acceptance and effectiveness of smart technologies for supporting independent and full lives for older citizens.

[1]  Hamed Taherdoost,et al.  A Review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories , 2023, International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research.

[2]  S. Manor,et al.  Digital ageism: A new kind of discrimination , 2021, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[3]  L. Ayalon,et al.  “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use , 2021, Journal of aging studies.

[4]  Katarzyna Skałacka,et al.  Digital or In-Person: The Relationship Between Mode of Interpersonal Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Mental Health in Older Adults From 27 Countries , 2021, Journal of family nursing.

[5]  Vera Stara,et al.  A Qualitative Study toward Technologies for Active and Healthy Aging: A Thematic Analysis of Perspectives among Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary End Users , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  Older adults' perspectives of smart home technology: Are we developing the technology that older people want? , 2021, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  S. Pink,et al.  Smart Homes for Seniors: Intelligent Home Solutions for Independent Living , 2021 .

[8]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Older adults' acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  S. Charles,et al.  Living Alone During COVID-19: Social Contact and Emotional Well-being Among Older Adults , 2020, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[10]  M. Kumagai At Manchester, UK , 2020, Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan.

[11]  O. Tuisku,et al.  9 Assistive robots in care: Expectations and perceptions of older people , 2020, Aging between Participation and Simulation.

[12]  Sandra C Buttigieg,et al.  Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  R. Pak,et al.  Looking for Age Differences in Self-Driving Vehicles: Examining the Effects of Automation Reliability, Driving Risk, and Physical Impairment on Trust , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Johanna L. H. Birkland Guardians: The Technological Resistance Fighters , 2019, Gerontechnology.

[15]  Dustin J. Souders,et al.  Predictors of Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles: The Roles of Age, Gender, Prior Knowledge, and Personality , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Phillippa Carnemolla,et al.  Ageing in place and the internet of things – how smart home technologies, the built environment and caregiving intersect , 2018, Visualization in Engineering.

[17]  John‐Stewart Gordon The ethics of ageing. , 2018, Bioethics.

[18]  Babak A. Farshchian,et al.  Acceptance of Health-Related ICT among Elderly People Living in the Community: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  Direct health and residential care costs of people living with dementia in Australian residential aged care , 2018, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[20]  U. Gunawardana,et al.  Barriers in acceptance of Ambient Assisted Living technologies among older Australians , 2017, 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC).

[21]  Peter A. Flach,et al.  Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers’ perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies , 2017, BMC medical ethics.

[22]  Arni Ariani,et al.  Challenges in Seniors Adopting Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review , 2016 .

[23]  J. Coughlin,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults' Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers , 2015 .

[24]  Sil Aarts,et al.  Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place , 2015, Gerontology.

[25]  J. Ives,et al.  A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies , 2015, BMC Medical Ethics.

[26]  Christina Jaschinski,et al.  Ambient Assisted Living: Benefits and Barriers From a User-Centered Perspective , 2014 .

[27]  A. Zwitter Big Data ethics , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[28]  G. Nejat,et al.  Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults , 2014, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[29]  S. Athar Principles of Biomedical Ethics , 2011, The Journal of IMA.

[30]  Athena McLean,et al.  Ethical frontiers of ICT and older users: cultural, pragmatic and ethical issues , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[31]  Pgs Paul Rutten,et al.  Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  S. Zwijsen,et al.  Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature , 2011, Aging & mental health.

[33]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  H. Remmers,et al.  Environments for ageing, assistive technology and self-determination: ethical perspectives , 2010, Informatics for health & social care.

[35]  Anthony F. Norcio,et al.  A Systematic Review of Technologies Designed to Improve and Assist Cognitive Decline for Both the Current and Future Aging Populations , 2009, HCI.

[36]  David Isaacs,et al.  The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter , 2005 .

[37]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[38]  Martin Parker,et al.  The Medical Profession and Human Rights: Handbook for a Changing Agenda , 2002 .

[39]  H. Alhussian,et al.  Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology by Senior Citizens: A Systematic Review , 2020, CSOC.

[40]  I. Holcombe-James,et al.  Measuring Australia’s digital divide: the Australian digital inclusion index 2020 , 2020 .

[41]  J. Ives,et al.  Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , 2017 .

[42]  Carl K. Chang,et al.  Perceptions of technology among older adults. , 2013, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[43]  A. Fels The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission , 1995 .