Digital Legacy Management Systems: Theoretical, Systemic and User's Perspective

There are now relatively new systems and functionalities aimed at digital legacy management. In this paper, our objective is to analyze the domain of digital legacy management systems from three perspectives: the theoretical, the systemic and the users’. Due to the complexity of those systems, these perspectives were analyzed jointly and in an exploratory approach. Therefore, this article proposes the following classification of digital legacy management systems: dedicated systems and integrated systems. The innovative results from this study allow software developers to better understand important issues concerning the complex cultural practices in this domain, thus contributing to a rich discussion on those systems, their requirements and limits to their development.

[1]  Lilian Edwards,et al.  'What Happens to My Facebook Profile When I Die?' : Legal Issues Around Transmission of Digital Assets on Death , 2013 .

[2]  Gustavo S. Ueda,et al.  Um Negócio de Dois Mundos: Aspectos da Morte no Mundo Físico Transpostos para Memoriais Digitais , 2019, Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social.

[3]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Analysis of the Features of Online Tools in the Post-mortem Digital Legacy Domain , 2018 .

[4]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Interacting with digital memorials in a cemetery: Insights from an immersive practice , 2017, 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[5]  Ursula Thomas,et al.  Preparing Your Digital Legacy: Assessing Awareness of Digital Natives , 2014 .

[6]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Perspectivas Normativas para o Legado Digital Pós-Morte Face à Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais , 2020 .

[8]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  The process of production of capital , 1954 .

[9]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Internet Users' Legal and Technical Perspectives on Digital Legacy Management for Post-mortem Interaction , 2015, HCI.

[10]  R. Prates,et al.  Exploring Young Adults’ Understanding and Experience with a Digital Legacy Management System , 2019 .

[11]  J. Hopkins,et al.  Afterlife in the Cloud: Managing a Digital Estate , 2013 .

[12]  Barbara Carminati,et al.  What Happens to My Online Social Estate When I Am Gone? An Integrated Approach to Posthumous Online Data Management , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration.

[13]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  The internet generation and its representations of death: considerations for posthumous interaction projects , 2012, IHC.

[14]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials , 2012, CHI.

[15]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  The Acceptability of Digital Immortality: Today's Human is Tomorrow's Avatar , 2017, IHC.

[16]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Analysis of Terms of Use and Privacy Policies in Social Networks to Treat Users' Death , 2017, WAIHCWS.

[17]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Combining Configurable Interaction Anticipation Challenges and Volitional Aspects in the Analysis of Digital Posthumous Communication Systems , 2017 .

[18]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Digital Memorials: A proposal for data management beyond life , 2017, IHC.

[19]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Legacy in the age of the internet: reflections on how interactive systems shape how we are remembered , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[20]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Interaction Anticipation: Communicating Impacts of Groupware Configuration Settings to Users , 2015, IS-EUD.

[21]  Luis Amaral,et al.  A study on the need of digital heritage management plataforms , 2016, 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[22]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  An Analysis of Users' Preferences on Pre-Management of Digital Legacy , 2018, IHC.

[23]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Recommendations for the Design of Digital Memorials in Social Web , 2019, HCI.

[24]  Livia Teixeira Leal Internet e morte do usuário: a necessária superação do paradigma da herança digital , 2018 .

[25]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Stewarding a legacy: responsibilities and relationships in the management of post-mortem data , 2014, CHI.

[26]  Joachim Pfister,et al.  "This will cause a lot of work.": Coping with Transferring Files and Passwords as Part of a Personal Digital Legacy , 2017, CSCW.

[27]  Aisling Kelliher,et al.  Engaging with Death Online: An Analysis of Systems that Support Legacy-Making, Bereavement, and Remembrance , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Issues of the social web interaction project faced with afterlife digital legacy , 2011, IHC+CLIHC.

[29]  DEF , 2021, Proceedings of the 26th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference.

[30]  Patricia Cristiane de Souza,et al.  Prominent issues for privacy establishment in privacy policies of mobile apps , 2016, IHC.

[31]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Political Economy of Death in the Age of Information: A Critical Approach to the Digital Afterlife Industry , 2017, Minds and Machines.

[32]  John Romano,et al.  Your Digital Afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter Are Your Estate, What's Your Legacy? , 2010 .

[33]  Stephan Micklitz,et al.  "I hereby leave my email to...": Data Usage Control and the Digital Estate , 2013, 2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops.

[34]  Raquel Oliveira Prates,et al.  A Conceptual Framework to design Users Digital Legacy Management Systems , 2017, IHC.