Characterization of Brain Dynamics Using Beamformer Techniques: Advantages and Limitations

The objective of biomagnetic neuroimaging is to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of electrical activity within the human brain by measuring the magnetic field outside the head. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides such a tool where measurements are performed non-invasively at numerous locations surrounding the head. The high sensitivity of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUID) utilized by current MEG systems combined with advanced hardware and software noise cancellation techniques allow the detection of minute magnetic fields generated by electrical neural activity with good accuracy. The ability to directly observe the neuronal fields allows MEG to have millisecond time resolution, orders of magnitude higher than the time resolution of fMRI and PET. While the electrical signals measured by electroencephalography (EEG) are strongly influenced by inhomogeneities in the head, the magnetic fields measured by MEG are produced mainly by current flow in the relatively homogenous intracranial space, permitting more accurate spatial localization (Hamalainen et al. 1993). Although electromagnetic fields are fully described by Maxwell’s equations, the problem of obtaining the spatiotemporal distributions of the neural current generators from MEG data (referred to as the inverse problem) poses a challenge since it is inherently ill-defined (Hamalainen et al., 1993). Since the neural current generators lie within the human head, a conducting medium, it is not possible to develop a mathematical model that provides a unique solution. Instead, several methods with different assumptions have been developed, each of which has its own advantages and limitations (Pascarella et al., 2010; Sekihara and Nagarajan, 2008; Wipf and Nagarajan, 2009). Generally, inverse models in MEG can be separated into two classes: parametric models and imaging models. Parametric models are global solutions that attempt to account for the measured fields in their entirety in terms of a small number of sources. The most popular model in this class is the equivalent current dipole model (ECD), where non-linear leastsquare fits are used to estimate the parameters of the current dipoles requiring the number of sources to be known a priori, and are not easily able to reconstruct spatially distributed or extended sources. More advanced techniques have been developed in this class such as

[1]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  G. A. Miller,et al.  A specific test of hippocampal deficit in schizophrenia. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Performance analysis of the optimum beamformer in the presence of correlated sources and its behavior under spatial smoothing , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  Robinson Se,et al.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). , 2004 .

[5]  Mingxiong Huang,et al.  A non-invasive method for observing hippocampal function , 2003, Neuroreport.

[6]  G. Borgiotti,et al.  Superresolution of uncorrelated interference sources by using adaptive array techniques , 1979 .

[7]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Semantic information alters neural activation during transverse patterning performance , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Recent Advances in Biomagnetism , 2007 .

[9]  Wilkin Chau,et al.  Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Greenblatt,et al.  Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  M-X Huang,et al.  Commonalities and Differences Among Vectorized Beamformers in Electromagnetic Source Imaging , 2003, Brain Topography.

[12]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Adaptive beamforming for coherent signals and interference , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[13]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[14]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Shannon D. Blunt,et al.  Spatio–Temporal Reconstruction of Bilateral Auditory Steady-State Responses Using MEG Beamformers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  R. Leahy,et al.  On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  A Tikhonov,et al.  Solution of Incorrectly Formulated Problems and the Regularization Method , 1963 .

[19]  関原 謙介,et al.  Adaptive Spatial Filters for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging , 2008 .

[20]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michele Piana,et al.  Particle filtering, beamforming and multiple signal classification for the analysis of magnetoencephalography time series: A comparison of algorithms , 2010 .

[22]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Auditory evoked fields to vocalization during passive listening and active generation in adults who stutter , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  David Poeppel,et al.  Application of an MEG eigenspace beamformer to reconstructing spatio‐temporal activities of neural sources , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[25]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[26]  Douglas O. Cheyne,et al.  Reconstruction of correlated brain activity with adaptive spatial filters in MEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  David Poeppel,et al.  Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  David P. Wipf,et al.  A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Detection and localization of hippocampal activity using beamformers with MEG: A detailed investigation using simulations and empirical data , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[30]  B. Carlson Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays , 1988 .

[31]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model , 2007, NeuroImage.

[32]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  M. Quraan,et al.  Continuous head localization and data correction in MEG , 2007 .