The effects of filtered video on awareness and privacy

Video-based media spaces are designed to support casual interaction between intimate collaborators. Yet transmitting video is fraught with privacy concerns. Some researchers suggest that the video stream be filtered to mask out potentially sensitive information. While a variety of filtering techniques exist, they have not been evaluated for how well they safeguard privacy. In this paper, we analyze how a blur and a pixelize video filter might impact both awareness and privacy in a media space. Each filter is considered at nine different levels of fidelity, ranging from heavily applied filter levels that mask almost all information, to lightly applied filters that reveal almost everything. We examined how well observers of several filtered video scenes extract particular awareness cues: the number of actors; their posture (moving, standing, seated); their gender; the visible objects (basic to detailed); and how available people look (their busyness, seriousness and approachability). We also examined the privacy-preserving potential of each filter level in the context of common workplace activities. Our results suggest that the blur filter, and to a lesser extent the pixelize filter, have a level suitable for providing awareness information while safeguarding privacy.

[1]  H. Pluckrose,et al.  Things to See , 1973 .

[2]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Privacy in Collaborative Computing , 1996, BCS HCI.

[3]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Fast algorithms for low-level vision , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[4]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Evaluating image filtering based techniques in media space applications , 1998, CSCW '98.

[5]  John C. Tang,et al.  Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions , 1994, CSCW '94.

[6]  R. Harper Why people do and don't wear active badges: a case study , 1995 .

[7]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[8]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Making contact: getting the group communicating with groupware , 1993, COCS '93.

[9]  Andreas Girgensohn,et al.  NYNEX portholes: initial user reactions and redesign implications , 1997, GROUP.

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[11]  James L. Crowley,et al.  Perceptual user interfaces: things that see , 2000, CACM.

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[13]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Mediating awareness and communication through digital but physical surrogates , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system , 1992, CHI.