Hyperlinks as Institutionalized Connective Public Goods for Collective Action Online

Nongovernmental organization NGO hyperlink networks are institutionalized connective public goods. They influence which actors and what aspects of social issues are made visible to the public in search engine results. To understand how contextual forces and institutional pressures influence who hyperlinks to whom online, this research examines a hyperlink network of 410 NGOs with various social missions operating across China. It suggests that institutional factors external to the network impact the structure of NGO hyperlink networks. In particular, institutional convener and legal registration status induce homophily hyperlinking effects among organizations, controlling for network interdependencies and other organizational attributes. Implications for hyperlink networks, institutional homophily, NGO collective action, and the development of civil society in China are drawn from the results.

[1]  Amy L. Kenworthy,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: Campbellian Antinomies and Organizational Foundings , 1999 .

[2]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  International Nonprofit Collaboration , 2015 .

[3]  Sanjeev Khagram,et al.  Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms , 2002 .

[4]  Sandra González-Bailón.  TRAPS ON THE WEB , 2009 .

[5]  Anat Ben-David,et al.  The Palestinian—Israeli peace process and transnational issue networks: the complicated place of the Israeli NGO , 2008, New Media Soc..

[6]  H. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Political opportunity structure and the institutionalisation of the environmental movement , 1997 .

[7]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Structural changes in the 2003–2009 global hyperlink network , 2011 .

[8]  Garry Robins,et al.  Exponential random graph models for social networks: theories, methods and applications , 2012 .

[9]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[10]  Martina Morris,et al.  Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[11]  R. Ackland,et al.  Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[12]  Timothy Hildebrandt,et al.  The Political Economy of Social Organization Registration in China* , 2011, The China Quarterly.

[13]  A. Yang.  When Transnational Civil Network Meets Local Context: An Exploratory Hyperlink Network Analysis of Northern/Southern NGOs' Virtual Network in China , 2013 .

[14]  Reza Hasmath,et al.  Isomorphic Pressures, Epistemic Communities and State-NGO Collaboration in China , 2014 .

[15]  D. Hunter,et al.  Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models , 2008 .

[16]  Martina Morris,et al.  Specification of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Computational Aspects. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[17]  Anthony J. Spires.  Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China’s Grassroots NGOs1 , 2011, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  The Emergence of Subversive Charities in China , 2015 .

[19]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Production of Collective Action in Alliance-Based Interorganizational Communication and Information Systems , 1998 .

[20]  Peter Ho,et al.  Greening Without Conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and Civil Society in China , 2001 .

[21]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[22]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2005 .

[23]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  The North/South Divide in NGO Hyperlink Networks , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[25]  Aimei Yang,et al.  Relationship-building by Chinese ENGOs’ websites: Education, not activation , 2010 .

[26]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Culture and the Structure of the International Hyperlink Network , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems , 1996 .

[28]  Andrew Pilny,et al.  HYPERLINKS AS EXTENSIONS OF OFFLINE INSTRUMENTAL COLLECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[29]  Steven M. Goodreau,et al.  Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models applied to a large social network , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[30]  M. S. Weber,et al.  The Flow of Digital News in a Network of Sources, Authorities, and Hubs , 2011 .

[31]  Robert Ackland,et al.  A Relational Hyperlink Analysis of an Online Social Movement , 2011, J. Soc. Struct..

[32]  Juliette De Maeyer,et al.  Towards a hyperlinked society: A critical review of link studies , 2013, New Media Soc..

[33]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[34]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Connective collective action online: An examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[36]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Interorganizational Hyperlink Networks among Websites in South Korea , 2002 .

[37]  Robert Ackland,et al.  How Web 1.0 fails: the mismatch between hyperlinks and clickstreams , 2014, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[38]  Yohei Kobashi,et al.  Energy policy participation through networks transcending cleavage: an analysis of Japanese and German renewable energy promotion policies , 2015 .