Fairness and Diversity in the Recommendation and Ranking of Participatory Media Content

Online participatory media platforms that enable one-to-many communication among users, see a significant amount of user generated content and consequently face a problem of being able to recommend a subset of this content to its users. We address the problem of recommending and ranking this content such that different viewpoints about a topic get exposure in a fair and diverse manner. We build our model in the context of a voice-based participatory media platform running in rural central India, for low-income and less-literate communities, that plays audio messages in a ranked list to users over a phone call and allows them to contribute their own messages. In this paper, we describe our model and evaluate it using call-logs from the platform, to compare the fairness and diversity performance of our model with the manual editorial processes currently being followed. Our models are generic and can be adapted and applied to other participatory media platforms as well.

[1]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Controlling Popularity Bias in Learning-to-Rank Recommendation , 2017, RecSys.

[2]  Jie Zhang,et al.  A personalized credibility model for recommending messages in social participatory media environments , 2013, World Wide Web.

[3]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[4]  D. Crane.  Search Neutrality as an Antitrust Principle , 2011 .

[5]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm , 2017, CIKM.

[6]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[7]  Ronald E. Robertson,et al.  The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Aaditeshwar Seth,et al.  Ensuring Responsible Outcomes from Technology , 2019, ArXiv.

[9]  Pratik Gajane,et al.  On formalizing fairness in prediction with machine learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[10]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[11]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Managing political differences in social media , 2014, CSCW.

[12]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[13]  L. Diamond,et al.  Liberation technology 1 , 2015 .

[14]  Eduardo M. Hargreaves,et al.  Facebook News Feed personalization filter: a case study during the Brazilian elections , 2020, 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[15]  Chinmayi Arun,et al.  On WhatsApp, Rumours, Lynchings, and the Indian Government , 2019 .

[16]  Nathan Srebro,et al.  Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning , 2016, NIPS.

[17]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[18]  Wei Wang,et al.  Recommender system application developments: A survey , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Nisheeth K. Vishnoi,et al.  Ranking with Fairness Constraints , 2017, ICALP.

[20]  Aaditeshwar Seth,et al.  Design Lessons from Creating a Mobile-based Community Media Platform in Rural India , 2016, ICTD.

[21]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[22]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings , 2018, SIGIR.

[23]  Julia Stoyanovich,et al.  Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs , 2016, SSDBM.

[24]  Michael Carl Tschantz,et al.  Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings , 2014, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[25]  Jie Zhang,et al.  A Social Network Based Approach to Personalized Recommendation of Participatory Media Content , 2021, ICWSM.

[26]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models , 2007 .

[27]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign , 2018 .

[28]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Experiences from a mobile-based behaviour change campaign on maternal and child nutrition in rural India , 2019, ICTD.

[29]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Biases in the Facebook News Feed: A Case Study on the Italian Elections , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[30]  Tapan S. Parikh,et al.  Avaaj Otalo: a field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India , 2010, CHI.

[31]  Ayman Farahat,et al.  How effective is targeted advertising? , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[32]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Fairness of Exposure in Rankings , 2018, KDD.

[33]  William Thies,et al.  Emergent practices around CGNet Swara, voice forum for citizen journalism in rural India , 2012, ICTD.

[34]  James Grimmelmann.  Some Skepticism About Search Neutrality , 2011 .

[35]  Apurv Jain.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2017, Business Economics.

[36]  S. Rhoades.  The Herfindahl-Hirschman index , 1993 .