Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration.

At present there are no specific primary standards for 192Ir high dose rate sources used in brachytherapy. Traceability to primary standards is guaranteed through the method recommended by the AAPM that derives the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays as the average of the air kerma calibration factors for x-rays and 137Cs gamma-rays or the Maréchal et al. method that uses the energy-weighted air kerma calibration factors for 250 kV x rays and 60Co gamma rays as the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays. In order to use these methods, it is necessary to use the same buildup cap for all energies and the appropriate wall correction factor for each chamber. This work describes experimental work used to derive the A(W) for four different ionization chambers and different buildup cap materials for the three energies involved in the Maréchal et al. method. The A(W) for the two most common ionization chambers used in hospitals, the Farmer NE 2571 and PTW N30001 is 0.995 and 0.997, respectively, for 250 kV x rays, 0.982 and 0.985 for 192Ir gamma rays, and 0.979 and 0.991 for 60Co gamma rays, all for a PMMA build-up cap of 0.550 gm cm(-2). A comparison between the experimental values and Monte Carlo calculations shows an agreement better than 0.9%. Availability of the A(W) correction factors for all commercial chambers allows users of the in-air calibration jig, provided by the manufacturer, to alternatively use the Maréchal et al. method. Calibration laboratories may also used this method for calibration of a well-type ionization chamber with a comparable accuracy to the AAPM method.

[1]  Ravinder Nath,et al.  Calculated response and wall correction factors for ionization chambers exposed to 60Co gamma rays , 1981 .

[2]  J Borg,et al.  Spectra and air-kerma strength for encapsulated 192Ir sources. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Chavaudra,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations of the ionization chamber wall correction factors for 192Ir and 60Co gamma rays and 250 kV x-rays for use in calibration of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  David W. O. Rogers,et al.  Wall attenuation and scatter corrections for ion chambers: measurements versus calculations , 1990 .

[5]  D W Pearson,et al.  Calibration of 192Ir high-dose-rate afterloading systems. , 1991, Medical physics.

[6]  C. E. Almeida,et al.  The effect of build-up cap materials on the response of an ionization chamber to 60Co gamma rays , 1993 .

[7]  Aapm A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1983, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Loftus,et al.  Comparison of Exposure Standards for 60Co Gamma Rays , 1975 .

[9]  T. Loftus,et al.  Standardization of 60Co and 137Cs Gamma-Ray Beams in Terms of Exposure. , 1974, Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and chemistry.

[10]  J F Williamson,et al.  Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  L A DeWerd,et al.  The half-life of high dose rate Ir-192 sources. , 1993, Medical physics.