Similar products different processes: Exploring the orchestration of digital resources in a primary school project

Today, teachers and pupils are interacting with digital devices during different types of activities in the classroom context. During such activities, dialogic interaction has a particular value as a pedagogical practice that helps to develop pupils' understanding. This study has explored the question: In what ways do digital resources support dialogic and synergistic interaction?In order to explore primary school pupils' interaction within group activity and how they make use of the features of the laptops, the empirical material was collected through video recordings and further analysed with the interactivity analysis framework (IAF) developed by Beauchamp and Kennewell (2010). The findings show that although the products produced by the different groups of pupils were similar in a technological way (i.e. the pupils used the same modes of expression), the patterns of interaction during the group processes varied. Two out of six groups used the digital resource as an 'object of interaction', where the tool had a more passive role during the group collaboration. The other four groups used the ICT resource as a 'tool for interaction', where the resource became more of an interaction partner during the meaning-making processes, which opened up opportunities for learning. The findings also indicate that the interplay in these four groups between the group members and the laptop features seems to have developed the pupils' understanding of ICT resources as well as their understanding of the subject content during the group work. Synergistic interaction with ICT was rather rare but was observed in one of the groups. We examine in what ways ICT support dialogic and synergistic group interaction.Pupils' products became quite similar but the interaction processes with ICT varied.Dialogic interaction with ICT could be evidenced in four groups.Synergistic interaction with ICT was rather rare but could be found in one group.The understanding of using the laptop features and the subject content were related.

[1]  Rupert Wegerif,et al.  Thinking and Learning with ICT: Raising Achievement in Primary Classrooms , 2004 .

[2]  G. Wells Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education , 1999 .

[3]  Paul Warwick,et al.  In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life , 2010 .

[5]  Philip Scott,et al.  The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons , 2006 .

[6]  Lyn Dawes,et al.  RESEARCH REPORT , 2004 .

[7]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[8]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[9]  R. Wegerif Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue , 2008 .

[10]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  The influence of ICT on the interactivity of teaching , 2008, Education and Information Technologies.

[11]  C. Jewitt Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms , 2008 .

[12]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[13]  J. Wertsch Mind as action , 1998 .

[14]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Interactivity and ICT in the primary school: categories of learner interactions with and without ICT , 2011 .

[15]  Lyn Dawes Talking and learning in classroom science , 2004 .

[16]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[17]  N. Mercer,et al.  Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning , 2003 .

[18]  R. Wegerif Towards a Dialogic Theory of How Children Learn to Think. , 2011 .

[19]  R. Wegerif,et al.  Stand-alone computers supporting learning dialogues in primary classrooms , 2003 .

[20]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking , 2007 .