Performances of Al2O3/SiC hybrid nanofluids in minimum-quantity lubrication grinding

The present research investigated the lubrication performances of Al2O3/SiC nanofluid minimum-quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding in accordance with recent technologies used in conducting minimum-quantity lubrication grinding with nanofluids. The mean grain size of the Al2O3 and SiC nanoparticles (NPs) was set to 50 nm, and the difficult grinding Ni-based alloy was used as the workpiece material in the experiment. Grinding force was measure by using a three-component dynamometer and then used to calculate grinding force ratio (R). Workpiece surface roughness was measured by a roughness tester. Five groups of NPs were mixed with synthetic lipids at a mass fraction of 6 %. The lipids were then used as the grinding fluid for the nanofluid MQL grinding. Results showed that, compared with pure SiC NPs, pure Al2O3 NPs obtained lower R = 0.3, lower specific grinding energy (U = 75.93 J/mm3), and lower surface roughness (Ra = 0.386 μm), indicating better lubrication performance. The mixed NP consisting of Al2O3 and SiC NPs achieved even lower R and surface roughness than pure NPs because of the “physical synergistic effect.” The optimal ratio of the effect of mixed NPs was explored based on this finding. The Al2O3/SiC (2:1) mixed NPs obtained the smallest R = 0.28 and specific grinding energy (U = 60.68 J/mm3), thus indicating the best lubrication performance. Therefore, 2:1 is the optimal ratio for mixed NPs.

[1]  Dongzhou Jia,et al.  Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding , 2015 .

[2]  Yanmin Wang,et al.  Tribological properties of magnetite nanoparticles with various morphologies as lubricating additives , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[3]  A. Kwade,et al.  Effect of the primary particle morphology on the micromechanical properties of nanostructured alumina agglomerates , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[4]  Taghi Tawakoli,et al.  Minimal quantity lubrication-MQL in grinding of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy , 2009 .

[5]  V. C. Moore,et al.  Band Gap Fluorescence from Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes , 2002, Science.

[6]  Anil K. Srivastava,et al.  An experimental investigation of temperatures during conventional and CBN grinding , 2007 .

[7]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  Application of Nanofluids in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Grinding , 2008 .

[8]  Li Bin,et al.  クリノアタカマイトCu2(OH)3ClとテノライトCuOナノ粒子のpH制御選択合成 , 2014 .

[9]  N. Cook,et al.  The Wear of Grinding Wheels: Part 1—Attritious Wear , 1971 .

[10]  Taghi Tawakoli,et al.  Temperature and energy partition in minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process , 2012 .

[11]  Ahmed A. D. Sarhan,et al.  Reduction of power and lubricant oil consumption in milling process using a new SiO2 nanolubrication system , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[12]  Ichiro Inasaki,et al.  Tribology of Abrasive Machining Processes , 2004 .

[13]  Zhixiong Zhou,et al.  Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication , 2012 .

[14]  Changhe Li,et al.  Experimental verification of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication effectiveness in grinding , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[15]  Zhixiong Zhou,et al.  Analysis of suspension stability for nanofluid applied in minimum quantity lubricant grinding , 2014 .

[16]  R. Chou,et al.  CuO, ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles as antiwear additive in oil lubricants , 2008 .

[17]  S. Malkin,et al.  Thermal Analysis of Grinding , 2007 .

[18]  G. Peterson,et al.  Experimental investigation of temperature and volume fraction variations on the effective thermal conductivity of nanoparticle suspensions (nanofluids) , 2006 .

[19]  B. Sadeghi,et al.  Thermal analysis of minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process , 2012 .

[20]  Xuan Yi-min LBM Parallel Computation for Flow and Heat Transfer of Nanofluids , 2005 .

[21]  Pil-Ho Lee,et al.  Environmentally-Friendly Nano-fluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Meso-scale Grinding Process Using Nano-diamond Particles , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Manufacturing Automation.

[22]  Nihat Tosun,et al.  Gray relational analysis of performance characteristics in MQL milling of 7075 Al alloy , 2010 .

[23]  Ioan D. Marinescu,et al.  2 – Tribosystems of Abrasive Machining Processes , 2013 .

[24]  J. Kouam,et al.  Effects of minimum quantity lubricating (MQL) conditions on machining of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy , 2015 .

[25]  Dongzhou Jia,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Lubrication Performance of MoS2/CNT Nanofluid for Minimal Quantity Lubrication in Ni-based Alloy Grinding , 2015 .

[26]  Yu Su,et al.  Performance evaluation of nanofluid MQL with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning , 2016 .

[27]  Changhe Li,et al.  Investigation into Engineering Ceramics Grinding Mechanism and the Influential Factors of the Grinding Force , 2014 .

[28]  Yoshitake Masuda,et al.  α-Fe2O3ナノ構造体の形状制御合成:改良した光触媒分解効率のための表面特性の加工 , 2013 .

[29]  L. Chibante,et al.  Improving the heat transfer of nanofluids and nanolubricants with carbon nanotubes , 2005 .

[30]  Bingqiang Cao,et al.  The tribology properties of alumina/silica composite nanoparticles as lubricant additives , 2011 .

[31]  Zhixiong Zhou,et al.  The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication , 2013 .

[32]  Michel Boissière,et al.  潜在的な発光および磁気2モード画像化プローブとしてのポリオール合成Zn0.9Mn0.1ナノ粒子:合成,特性評価,および毒性研究 , 2012 .

[33]  Changhe Li,et al.  Investigation into the Formation Mechanism and Distribution Characteristics of Suspended Microparticles in MQL Grinding , 2014 .

[34]  M. Morgan,et al.  Temperatures in fine grinding with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) , 2012 .

[35]  Ajay P. Malshe,et al.  Tribological study of nano lubricant integrated soybean oil for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding , 2010 .