Truly hybrid interventional MR/X-ray system: investigation of in vivo applications.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to provide in vivo demonstrations of the functionality of a truly hybrid interventional x-ray/magnetic resonance (MR) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A digital flat-panel x-ray system (1,024(2) array of 200 microm pixels, 30 frames per second) was integrated into an interventional 0.5-T magnet. The hybrid system is capable of MR and x-ray imaging of the same field of view without patient movement. Two intravascular procedures were performed in a 22-kg porcine model: placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) (x-ray-guided catheterization of the hepatic vein, MR fluoroscopy-guided portal puncture, and x-ray-guided stent placement) and mock chemoembolization (x-ray-guided subselective catheterization of a renal artery branch and MR evaluation of perfused volume). RESULTS The resolution and frame rate of the x-ray fluoroscopy images were sufficient to visualize and place devices, including nitinol guidewires (0.016-0.035-inch diameter) and stents and a 2.3-F catheter. Fifth-order branches of the renal artery could be seen. The quality of both real-time (3.5 frames per second) and standard MR images was not affected by the x-ray system. During MR-guided TIPS placement, the trocar and the portal vein could be easily visualized, allowing successful puncture from hepatic to portal vein. CONCLUSION Switching back and forth between x-ray and MR imaging modalities without requiring movement of the patient was demonstrated. The integrated nature of the system could be especially beneficial when x-ray and MR image guidance are used iteratively.

[1]  C J Hardy,et al.  Real‐time interactive MRI on a conventional scanner , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  T Schmitz-Rode,et al.  Invited. MRI‐guided biopsy of bone in a hybrid system , 1998, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[3]  R J Herfkens,et al.  1999 Gary J. Becker Young Investigator Award. MR-guided transjugular portosystemic shunt placement in a swine model. , 1999, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  A Stargardt,et al.  Interventional magnetic resonance. Initial clinical experience with a 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance system combined with c-arm fluoroscopy. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Paul R. Granfors Performance characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel x-ray imaging detector , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[6]  W. Hall,et al.  Brain biopsy using high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[7]  J R Lake,et al.  Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with the wallstent endoprosthesis: results in 100 patients. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  N J Pelc,et al.  A truly hybrid interventional MR/X‐ray system: Feasibility demonstration , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  F S Keller,et al.  Technical aspects of accessing the portal vein during the TIPS procedure. , 1997, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[10]  P. Hayes,et al.  Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunting for control of acute and recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage related to portal hypertension. , 1993, Gut.

[11]  Perry Sprawls,et al.  Physical principles of medical imaging , 1987 .

[12]  J. Rank,et al.  Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on quality of life. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  P. Cole,et al.  Complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a comprehensive review. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.