Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for through-pedicle procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine

Posterior instrumentation through the pedicle is a common surgery. Understanding the morphometry of the pedicle and the anatomy of adjacent neural structures should help decrease the risk of postoperative complications. T1–L5 segments from 15 sets of human vertebrae were separated into individual vertebrae and the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar spine and the safe zone of the pedicle were analyzed. T11–L5 segments from six human cadavers were dissected. Measurements were taken from the pedicle to the dura and nerve roots superiorly, inferiorly, medially, and laterally, and the transverse angles of the nerve roots were measured. Pedicles were widest in L5 and narrowest in T4 in the transverse plane, and widest in T11 or T12 and narrowest in T1 in the sagittal plane. In individual pedicle, the ranges of the safe zone width and height were 3.4–7.7 and 8.6–13.7 mm, respectively, in T1–T10; and 7.2–17.8 and 13.9–16.7 mm, respectively, in T11–L5. The transverse angle of the pedicle decreases progressively from T1 to T12, then increase from L1 to L5. In sagittal angle, the largest angle localized at T2 and the smallest at L5. The mean distances from pedicles to adjacent neural structures were greater superiorly and laterally than inferiorly and medially. The lateral distance between nerve root and the pedicle ranged from 2.4 to 9.6 mm in lumbar spine. This study provides potential safe zones for the application of through-pedicle procedures to help decrease the risk of postoperative complications.

[1]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[2]  C. K. Lee,et al.  Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[3]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. , 1997, Spine.

[4]  M. Nordin,et al.  Low Back Pain in Schoolchildren A Study of Familial and Psychological Factors , 1995, Spine.

[5]  David G. Schwartz,et al.  Anatomic Considerations in Lumbar Posterolateral Percutaneous Procedures , 1995, Spine.

[6]  H. Deramond,et al.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. , 1987, Neuro-Chirurgie.

[7]  R. Louis Topographie vertébro-médullaire et vertébro-radiculaire , 1978, Anatomia clinica.

[8]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles , 1987, Spine.

[9]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Initial Outcome and Efficacy of “Kyphoplasty” in the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures , 2001, Spine.

[10]  S. Hou,et al.  Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. , 1993, Spine.

[11]  R Roy-Camille,et al.  Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Projection of the Lumbar Pedicle and its Morphometric Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[13]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  An Ex Vivo Evaluation of an Inflatable Bone Tamp Used to Reduce Fractures Within Vertebral Bodies Under Load , 2002, Spine.

[14]  F. Phillips,et al.  Early Radiographic and Clinical Results of Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures , 2003, Spine.

[15]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Relations Between the Lumbar Pedicle and the Adjacent Neural Structures , 1997, Spine.

[16]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Relations of the Thoracic Pedicle to the Adjacent Neural Structures , 1997, Spine.

[17]  D P McGowan,et al.  Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. , 1990, Spine.

[18]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[19]  Tain‐Hsiung Chen,et al.  Biomechanical Effects of the Body Augmenter for Reconstruction of the Vertebral Body , 2004, Spine.

[20]  F. Mendel,et al.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[22]  Frank M Phillips,et al.  Minimally Invasive Treatments of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures , 2003, Spine.

[23]  M H Krag,et al.  Morphometry of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Related to Transpedicular Screw Placement for Surgical Spinal Fixation , 1988, Spine.

[24]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement for adult spinal deformity with a pedicle-probing conventional anatomic technique. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[25]  D. Bradford,et al.  Complications of the Variable Screw Plate Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1991, Spine.

[26]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. , 1997, Spine.

[27]  S. Belkoff,et al.  An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of an Inflatable Bone Tamp Used in the Treatment of Compression Fracture , 2001, Spine.

[28]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Osteolytic Vertebral Collapse , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[30]  H. Matsuzaki,et al.  Problems and Solutions of Pedicle Screw Plate Fixation of Lumbar Spine , 1990, Spine.