Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group

ObjectivesTo evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and net benefit performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) across five European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), 1 United Kingdom, 1 Austrian, and 3 US biopsy cohorts.MethodsPCPTRC risks were calculated for 25,733 biopsies using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, family history, history of prior biopsy, and imputation for missing covariates. Predictions were evaluated using the areas underneath the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), discrimination slopes, chi-square tests of goodness of fit, and net benefit decision curves.ResultsAUCs of the PCPTRC ranged from a low of 56% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Rounds 2–6 cohort to a high of 72% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Round 1 cohort and were statistically significantly higher than that of PSA in 6 out of the 10 cohorts. The PCPTRC was well calibrated in the SABOR, Tyrol, and Durham cohorts. There was limited to no net benefit to using the PCPTRC for biopsy referral compared to biopsying all or no men in all five ERSPC cohorts and benefit within a limited range of risk thresholds in all other cohorts.ConclusionsExternal validation of the PCPTRC across ten cohorts revealed varying degree of success highly dependent on the cohort, most likely due to different criteria for and work-up before biopsy. Future validation studies of new calculators for prostate cancer should acknowledge the potential impact of the specific cohort studied when reporting successful versus failed validation.

[1]  Martha Sajatovic,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models , 2013 .

[2]  X. Agirre,et al.  Use of a combination of biomarkers in serum and urine to improve detection of prostate cancer , 2010, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  Donna P Ankerst,et al.  Validation in a multiple urology practice cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for predicting prostate cancer detection. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[4]  S. van Buuren Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification , 2007, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[6]  E. Steyerberg Clinical Prediction Models , 2008, Statistics for Biology and Health.

[7]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  Everything you always wanted to know about evaluating prediction models (but were too afraid to ask). , 2010, Urology.

[8]  Ziding Feng,et al.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Performance of prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator in a contemporary cohort screened for prostate cancer and diagnosed by extended prostate biopsy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[10]  M. Kattan Factors affecting the accuracy of prediction models limit the comparison of rival prediction models when applied to separate data sets. , 2011, European urology.

[11]  D. Mark,et al.  Clinical prediction models: are we building better mousetraps? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  Frederico Branco,et al.  Prostate cancer prevention trial and European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculators: a performance comparison in a contemporary screened cohort. , 2010, European urology.

[14]  Andrew J. Vickers,et al.  The Relationship between Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer Risk: The Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  Mário Oliveira,et al.  Head‐to‐head comparison of two online nomograms for prostate biopsy outcome prediction , 2011, BJU international.

[16]  R. V. D. van den Bergh,et al.  The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators indicating a positive prostate biopsy: a comparison , 2008, BJU international.

[17]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy: comparison of a novel logistic regression‐based model, the prostate cancer risk calculator, and prostate‐specific antigen level alone , 2009, BJU international.

[18]  Robin J Leach,et al.  Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[19]  Javier Hernandez,et al.  External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population. , 2006, Urology.

[20]  E. Elkin,et al.  Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.