Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing.

Numerous studies suggest that processing verbal materials containing negations slows down cognition and makes it more error-prone. This suggests that processing negations affords relatively nonautomatic processes. The present research studied the role of two automaticity features (processing speed and resource dependency) for negation processing. In three experiments, we tested the impact of verbal negations on affective priming effects in the Affect Misattribution Paradigm. Going beyond previous work, the results indicate that negations can be processed unintentionally and quickly (Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 3, negations failed to qualify affective priming effects when participants' working memory was taxed by memorizing an eight-digit number. In sum, the experiments suggest that negations can be processed unintentionally, very quickly, but that they rely on working-memory resources.

[1]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Activation and Inhibition of Affective Information: for Negative Priming in the Evaluation Task , 1999 .

[2]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pay attention! Attention to the primes increases attitude assessment accuracy , 2006 .

[3]  M. Rotteveel,et al.  Loading working memory enhances affective priming , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics , 1979 .

[6]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  S. C. Draine Analytic limitations of unconscious language processing , 1997 .

[8]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Stefaan Vandorpe,et al.  Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  B. Sternthal,et al.  The Influence of Negation on Product Evaluations , 2004 .

[11]  Jochen Musch,et al.  Goal-Dependent and Goal-Independent Effects of Irrelevant Evaluations , 2002 .

[12]  E. Burnstein,et al.  “I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding☆ , 2004 .

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Bargh The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[15]  Uri Hasson,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Believe It or Not On the Possibility of Suspending Belief , 2022 .

[16]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Accessibility effects on implicit social cognition: the role of knowledge activation and retrieval experiences. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Etienne P. LeBel,et al.  Attentional influences on affective priming: Does categorisation influence spontaneous evaluations of multiply categorisable objects? , 2010 .

[18]  J. S. Evans,et al.  REASONING WITH NEGATIVES , 1972 .

[19]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Pollyanna hypothesis. , 1969 .

[20]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure , 2009 .

[21]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses , 2002 .

[22]  Daniel Danner,et al.  Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[24]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[25]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  At the boundaries of automaticity: negation as reflective operation. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  Response Interference as a Mechanism Underlying Implicit Measures Some Traps and Gaps in the Assessment of Mental Associations with Experimental Paradigms , 2008 .

[27]  Dirk Hermans,et al.  Unintentional Processing of Motivational Valence , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[30]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  R. Fazio,et al.  Relations Between Implicit Measures of Prejudice , 2003, Psychological science.

[32]  Geert Crombez,et al.  Automatic attitude activation and efficiency: The fourth horseman of automaticity. , 2000 .

[33]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[34]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[35]  M. Klinger,et al.  Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[37]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.

[38]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  Contextual Influences on Implicit Evaluation: A Test of Additive Versus Contrastive Effects of Evaluative Context Stimuli in Affective Priming , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation☆ , 2008 .

[40]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[41]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Implicit measures of attitudes , 2007 .

[42]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Controllability and resource dependence in automatic evaluation , 2007 .