Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses

Human grasping and manipulation control critically depends on tactile feedback. Without this feedback, the ability for fine control of a prosthesis is limited in upper limb amputees. Although various approaches have been investigated in the past, at present there is no commercially available device able to restore tactile feedback in upper limb amputees. Based on the Discrete Event-driven Sensory feedback Control (DESC) policy we present a device able to deliver short-lasting vibrotactile feedback to transradial amputees using commercially available myoelectric hands. The device (DESC-glove) comprises sensorized thimbles to be placed on the prosthesis digits, a battery-powered electronic board, and vibrating units embedded in an arm-cuff being transiently activated when the prosthesis makes and breaks contact with objects. The consequences of using the DESC-glove were evaluated in a longitudinal study. Five transradial amputees were equipped with the device for one month at home. Through a simple test proposed here for the first time-the virtual eggs test-we demonstrate the effectiveness of the device for prosthetic control in daily life conditions. In the future the device could be easily exploited as an add-on to complement myoelectric prostheses or even embedded in prosthetic sockets to enhance their control by upper limb amputees.

[1]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Vijayakumar,et al.  The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[5]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[6]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Testing a Prosthetic Haptic Feedback Simulator With an Interactive Force Matching Task , 2008 .

[8]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[10]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems , 2005, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Predictive feed-forward sensory control during grasping and manipulation in man , 1993 .

[13]  P E Patterson,et al.  Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  David Hankin,et al.  First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: Historical perspective , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  R. Scott Feedback in myoelectric prostheses. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User–Prosthesis Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  A Multi-Class Proportional Myocontrol Algorithm for Upper Limb Prosthesis Control: Validation in Real-Life Scenarios on Amputees , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Stiffness Feedback for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses Using Vibrotactile Stimulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Nerve Repair: Correlation of Restitution of Functional Sensibility with Specific Cognitive Capacities , 1994, Journal of hand surgery.

[22]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[24]  G. Lundborg Nerve injury and repair – a challenge to the plastic brain , 2003 .

[25]  R R Riso,et al.  Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback--moving closer to the bionic arm. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[26]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Grip Force Control of sEMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hands in Targeted Reinnervation Amputees , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  Rita R. Hohlstein,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (3rd ed.) , 1990 .

[28]  Dario Farina,et al.  The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation , 2009 .

[30]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  S. Rn Feedback in myoelectric prostheses , 1990 .

[32]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  Benoni B. Edin,et al.  Acquiring and adapting a novel audiomotor map in human grasping , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[35]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Repeated Training with Augmentative Vibrotactile Feedback Increases Object Manipulation Performance , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  S C Jacobsen,et al.  Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[38]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.