Symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction are poorly correlated with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor

Introduction and hypothesisThe aim of the study was to determine whether patients’ symptoms agree with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor.MethodsSymptoms of pelvic organ dysfunction were measured with the use of three validated questionnaires. The domain scores were compared with POP-Q and dynamic MR imaging measurements. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to assess agreement.ResultsOnly the domain score genital prolapse was significantly correlated in the positive direction with the degree of pelvic organ prolapse as assessed by POP-Q and dynamic MR imaging (rs = 0.64 and 0.27, respectively), whereas the domain score urinary incontinence was inversely correlated (rs = −0.32 and −0.35, respectively).ConclusionsThe sensation or visualization of a bulge in the vagina was the only symptom which correlated positively with the degree of pelvic organ prolapse, and clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging showed similar correlation in this respect.

[1]  S. Salvatore,et al.  The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity tosymptoms and quality of life , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  J. Fielding,et al.  MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: review. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  L. Mouritsen,et al.  Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse , 2003, International Urogynecology Journal.

[4]  G. Cundiff,et al.  Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  B. Gurland,et al.  Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  A. Weber,et al.  Clinical Presentation of Enterocele , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Heintz,et al.  Measuring health‐related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: The urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited , 2003, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[8]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks , 2009, International Urogynecology Journal.

[9]  A. Weber,et al.  Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  C. Bradley,et al.  Vaginal Wall Descensus and Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Older Women , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  M. Barber,et al.  Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  L. Meyn,et al.  Pelvic Symptoms in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  J. Nicholas,et al.  Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  A. Heintz,et al.  Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors , 2006, International Urogynecology Journal.

[15]  C. Ghetti,et al.  Pelvic organ descent and symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  E. Lukacz,et al.  Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study , 2005, International Urogynecology Journal.

[17]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse , 2009, International Urogynecology Journal.