Operator decision making before starting and while doing an activity/task: development and evaluation of integrated front-end priming and heuristic risk management tools for operators

Motivation - This paper describes ongoing PhD research to develop and evaluate practical tools for use by operators to manage and control their risks in a dynamic environment, before starting and while undertaking an activity/task. Research approach - Three different industries are examined: mining, railway and construction. In each, several different comparative high-risk activities are examined; for example, working at heights. Findings/Design - Initial observations are currently taking place, before subsequent detailed data collection. Research limitations/Implications - Final risk management and decision making tools developed will likely differ for application depending on the company's maturity in risk management and level of risk by task/activity type. Originality/Value - This ongoing research explores the area of risk management and decision making, and is looking to marry together the appropriate common sets of systems and cognitive perspectives. Take away message - Practical tools, possibly computer-based, can be developed to help operators manage and control risks.

[1]  G. Breakwell The Psychology of Risk: Social amplification and social representations of risk , 2007 .

[2]  Ute Fischer,et al.  RISK PERCEPTION: A CRITICAL ELEMENT OF AVIATION SAFETY , 2002 .

[3]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition , 1980 .

[4]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Teamwork: emerging principles , 2000 .

[5]  Roberta Caldenvood Decision Models: Some Lessons From the Field , 1991 .

[6]  Dan Petersen Safety Management: A Human Approach , 1975 .

[7]  Ute Fischer,et al.  Error-Challenging Strategies: Their Role in Preventing and Correcting Errors , 2000 .

[8]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  A review of naturalistic decision making research with some implications for knowledge management , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Vigilant and Hypervigilant Decision Making , 1997 .

[11]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  Is this problem likely to be solved? A cognitive schema of effective problem solving , 2006 .

[12]  L. Wilkins,et al.  On the power of intuition. , 2001, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[13]  Ute Fischer,et al.  Linguistic correlates of team performance: toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[15]  E Salas,et al.  Vigilant and hypervigilant decision making. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  E. Salas,et al.  Taking stock of naturalistic decision making , 2001 .

[17]  Alexander M. Millkey The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2009 .

[18]  J. Carroll,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue. Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizational Decision Making: Exploring the Intersections , 2006 .

[19]  G. Gigerenzer Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious , 2007 .

[20]  Chris Blake The Art of Decisions: How to Manage in an Uncertain World , 2007 .