Measurement of community participation and use of leisure by service users with intellectual disabilities: The Guernsey Community Participation and Leisure Assessment (GCPLA).

Community integration is now an important principle guiding service provision for people with intellectual disabilities. However, it has been argued that research has contributed little in the way of guidance and that this is mainly because of the lack of appropriate measures. The Guernsey Community Participation and Leisure Assessment (GCPLA) is described in the present paper. The GCPLA is a comprehensive assessment of community participation and the use of leisure that produces both quantitative and qualitative data. Data are presented which suggest that the instrument is potentially both valid and reliable. A study comparing use of their community by service users and a staff control group showed that the service users had a smaller range of activities, were less busy (i.e. took part in fewer frequent activities), and were more likely to access their communities in the presence of staff or carers, rather than alone or with friends. Suggestions for the use of the GCPLA are discussed including individual planning, service evaluation and training.

[1]  K. Järbrink,et al.  The quality and costs of village communities, residential campuses and community-based residential supports for people with learning disabilities. , 2000 .

[2]  R. Stancliffe Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Empowerment factor. , 1999, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[3]  D. Felce,et al.  Service support to people in Wales with severe intellectual disability and the most severe challenging behaviours: processes, outcomes and costs. , 2002, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[4]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Longitudinal study of institutional downsizing: effects on individuals who remain in the institution. , 1998, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[5]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Analysis of expenditures and outcomes of residential alternatives for persons with developmental disabilities. , 1998, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[6]  P. Sturmey,et al.  Group engagement: a conceptual analysis. , 2008, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[7]  J. Mansell Specialized group homes for persons with severe or profound mental retardation and serious problem behaviour in England. , 1994, Research in developmental disabilities.

[8]  Tony Shelton,et al.  Momentary Time Sampling and Partial Interval Recording: A Rejoinder to Adams (1991) , 1994, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[9]  K. Lowe,et al.  Clients' community and social contacts: results of a 5-year longitudinal study. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[10]  J. S. Newton,et al.  The Social Networks and Activity Patterns of Adults with Severe Disabilities: A Correlational Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  J. Rojahn,et al.  Reliability of the Behavior Problems Inventory , 1989 .

[12]  H. Hemming II. MENTALLY HANDICAPPED ADULTS RETURNED TO LARGE INSTITUTIONS AFTER TRANSFERS TO NEW SMALL UNITS , 1982 .

[13]  D. Jeffree,et al.  Mentally handicapped adolescents: their use of leisure. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[14]  J. Bailey,et al.  The modification of leisure behavior in a half-way house for retarded women. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.