Private Protection Against Crime When Property Value is Private Information

This paper analyzes private precautions against crime when the value of the property to be protected is private information. Within a framework in which potential criminals can choose between various crime opportunities, we establish that decentralized decision-making by potential victims may lead to suboptimal levels of investment in private protection. Specifically, suboptimal investment can occur when observable precautions communicate information about property value to potential offenders, even when the diversion effect of private safety measures is taken into account.

[1]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  The Impact of Timing on Bidding Behavior in Procurement Auctions of Contracts with Private Costs , 2010 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe Nicolaï,et al.  The Role of Abatement Technologies for Allocating Free Allowances , 2011 .

[3]  Keith N. Hylton.  Optimal Law Enforcement and Victim Precaution , 1996 .

[4]  William N. Trumbull,et al.  The social value of crime , 1990 .

[5]  Steven Shavell,et al.  Individual Precautions to Prevent Theft: Private Versus Socially Optimalbehavior , 1990 .

[6]  Justus Haucap,et al.  Legal and illegal cartels in Germany between 1958 and 2004 , 2010 .

[7]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Piracy in a two-sided software market ☆ , 2013 .

[8]  Ivan P. L. Png,et al.  Private security: Deterrent or diversion? , 1994 .

[9]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  Collusion Through Joint R&D: An Empirical Assessment , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Justus Haucap,et al.  On File Sharing With Indirect Network Effects Between Concert Ticket Sales and Music Recordings , 2012 .

[11]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence , 2012, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[12]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  More Ads, More Revs? Is there a Media Bias in the Likelihood to be Reviewed? , 2012 .

[13]  Tanguy van Ypersele,et al.  Individual Protection Against Property Crime: Decomposing the Effects of Protection Observability , 2005 .

[14]  Christian Wey,et al.  The Effects of Remedies on Merger Activity in Oligopoly , 2012 .

[15]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma experiment , 2011, International Journal of Game Theory.

[16]  Michael Berlemann,et al.  Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt Out of Research Rankings? A Note , 2012 .

[17]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  The bank lending channel in Turkey: has it changed after the low-inflation regime? , 2012 .

[18]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  A comparative analysis of alternative univariate time series models in forecasting Turkish inflation , 2012 .

[19]  Fabrice Valognes,et al.  Property Crime with Private Protection: A Market-for-Offenses Approach , 2003 .

[20]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Getting beer during commercials: Adverse effects of ad-avoidance , 2011, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[21]  A. Barth,et al.  Does the growth of mobile markets cause the demise of fixed networks? - Evidence from the European Union , 2014 .

[22]  Irene Bertschek,et al.  More Bits – More Bucks? Measuring the Impact of Broadband Internet on Firm Performance , 2013, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[23]  Ignatius J. Horstmann,et al.  Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: To Patent or (Maybe) Not to Patent , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  A. Barth,et al.  Irrationality rings! - Experimental evidence on mobile tariff choices , 2011 .

[25]  Charles T. Clotfelter,et al.  Private security and the public safety , 1978 .

[26]  Torben Stühmeier,et al.  Access regulation with asymmetric termination costs , 2013 .

[27]  Anne-Kathrin Barth Ulrich Heimesho.  How Large is the Magnitude of Fixed-Mobile Call Substitution? - Empirical Evidence from 16 European Countries , 2012 .

[28]  Christian Kellner,et al.  The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Reward Scheme Choice , 2014 .

[29]  Geza Sapi,et al.  Technology Licensing by Advertising Supported Media Platforms: An Application to Internet Search Engines , 2011 .

[30]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Regulating Advertising in the Presence of Public Service Broadcasting , 2012 .

[31]  Justus Haucap,et al.  Consumer Behavior towards On-net/Off-net Price Differentiation , 2011 .

[32]  A. Barth,et al.  How large is the magnitude of fixed-mobile call substitution? Empirical evidence from 16 Europen countries , 2012 .

[33]  Justus Haucap,et al.  The Effects of Gasoline Price Regulations: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[34]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Criminal Opportunities , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[35]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  Public Safety Through Private Action: An Economic Assessment of Bids, Locks, and Citizen Cooperation , 2010 .

[36]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Signaling in deterministic and stochastic settings , 2012 .

[37]  Irene Bertschek,et al.  More Bits – More Bucks? Measuring the Impact of Broadband Internet on Firm Performance , 2013 .

[38]  P. Harrison,et al.  Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities Reported by Youth, 2008-09. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. NCJ 228416. , 2012 .

[39]  C. Clotfelter.  Public Services, Private Substitutes, and the Demand for Protection against Crime , 1977 .

[40]  Kate J. Bowers,et al.  Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations * , 2009 .

[41]  Isabel Teichmann,et al.  The Strategic Use of Private Quality Standards in Food Supply Chains , 2011 .

[42]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Strategic obfuscation and consumer protection policy in financial markets: Theory and experimental evidence , 2012 .

[43]  Alon Harel,et al.  Blaming the Victim: Optimal Incentives for Private Precautions against Crime , 1995 .

[44]  Christian Wey.  Unionization Structures in International Oligopoly , 2013 .

[45]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  First mover advantages in mobile telecommunications: Evidence from OECD countries , 2012 .

[46]  Joseph A. Clougherty,et al.  Using rival effects to identify synergies and improve merger typologies , 2010 .

[47]  Miguel A. Fonseca,et al.  Explicit vs. Tacit Collusion – The Impact of Communication in Oligopoly Experiments , 2012 .

[48]  Santiago M. Pinto.  Tax Competition in the Presence of Interjurisdictional Externalities: The Case of Crime Prevention , 2007 .

[49]  Clémence Christin,et al.  Entry Deterrence Through Cooperative R&D Over-Investment , 2013 .

[50]  Christian Wey,et al.  On the role of consumer expectations in markets with network effects , 2012 .

[51]  Santiago M. Pinto,et al.  Crime in a Multi-Jurisdictional Model with Private and Public Prevention , 2009 .

[52]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Competition in Germany s Minute Reserve Power Market : An Econometric Analysis , 2009 .

[53]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Deregulation of Shopping Hours: The Impact on Independent Retailers and Chain Stores , 2011 .

[54]  Geza Sapi,et al.  Bargaining, vertical mergers and entry , 2012 .

[55]  Bryan Engelhardt.  Criminal Associations with Bargaining and Build Frictions , 2010 .

[56]  Roman Inderst,et al.  Countervailing power and dynamic efficiency , 2011 .

[57]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Vertical Mergers, Foreclosure and Raising Rivals' Costs – Experimental Evidence , 2011 .

[58]  M. Kolmar,et al.  The State’s Enforcement Monopoly and the Private Protection of Property , 2011 .

[59]  Mehmet Karacuka,et al.  A Spatial Approach To Measure Productivity Spillovers Of Foreign Affiliated Firms In Turkish Manufacturing Industries , 2012 .

[60]  Annika Herr,et al.  Quality and Welfare in a Mixed Duopoly with Regulated Prices: The Case of a Public and a Private Hospital , 2011 .

[61]  Tobias Regner,et al.  Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the Internet: A natural field experiment , 2012 .

[62]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Investment behavior in a constrained dictator game , 2012 .

[63]  Klaus Gugler,et al.  How Effective is European Merger Control , 2011 .

[64]  Julia Graf,et al.  The effects of rebate contracts on the health care system , 2014, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[65]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Excess Capacity and Pricing in Bertrand-Edgeworth Markets: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[66]  L. Ronconi.  Comment on "Crime Distribution and Victim Behavior during a Crime Wave" , 2010 .

[67]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Transparency, price-dependent demand and product variety , 2011 .

[68]  Mikael Priks,et al.  The Effects of Surveillance Cameras on Crime: Evidence from the Stockholm Subway , 2009 .

[69]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  Pull-forward effects in the German car scrappage scheme: A time series approach , 2012 .

[70]  Hans Christian Müller,et al.  Forecast Errors in Undisclosed Management Sales Forecasts: The Disappearance of the Overoptimism Bias , 2011 .

[71]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  Competition in Turkish mobile telecommunications markets: Price elasticities and network substitution , 2011 .

[72]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of the 2004 EU Merger Policy Reform , 2013 .

[73]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Transparency, entry, and productivity , 2012 .

[74]  G. Lacroix,et al.  Private Protection against Crime , 1995 .

[75]  Georg Clemens,et al.  Rebels without a clue? Experimental evidence on partial cartels , 2013 .

[76]  Torben Stühmeier,et al.  Roaming and investments in the mobile internet market , 2012 .

[77]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Mergers, managerial incentives, and efficiencies , 2013 .

[78]  Robert W. Helsley,et al.  Gated Communities and the Economic Geography of Crime , 1999 .

[79]  P. Restrepo,et al.  Crime and Conspicuous Consumption , 2010 .

[80]  Paolo Buccirossi,et al.  Competition Policy and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Assessment , 2009 .

[81]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[82]  Fatima Lambarraa,et al.  On the Norms of Charitable Giving in Islam: A Field Experiment , 2012 .

[83]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  An equilibrium analysis of efficiency gains from mergers , 2012 .

[84]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  Consumer choice and local network effects in mobile telecommunications in Turkey , 2013 .

[85]  Gerhard Riener,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects in groups , 2013 .

[86]  Robert Powell,et al.  Allocating Defensive Resources with Private Information about Vulnerability , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[87]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Price-Dependent Demand in Spatial Models , 2012 .

[88]  N. Jentzsch,et al.  Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals , 2013 .

[89]  John E. Eck,et al.  DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS* , 2006 .

[90]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Cheap Talk About the Detection Probability , 2012 .

[91]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  The Changing Relationship between Income and Crime Victimization , 1999 .

[92]  Matthias Heinz,et al.  Do Women Behave More Reciprocally than Men? Gender Differences in Real Effort Dictator Games , 2012 .

[93]  Annika Herr,et al.  Pharmaceutical prices under regulation: Tiered co-payments and reference pricing in Germany , 2012 .

[94]  Gordon J. Klein,et al.  How regulation affects network and service quality in related markets , 2012 .

[95]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Hospital Market Concentration and Discrimination of Patients , 2013 .

[96]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Calling Party Pays or Receiving Party Pays? The Diffusion of Mobile Telephony with Endogenous Regulation , 2005 .

[97]  Marc Bataille,et al.  Intermodal competition on some routes in transportation networks: The case of inter urban buses and railways , 2013 .

[98]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Semi-collusion in media markets , 2011 .

[99]  Stefan Haigner,et al.  The first shall be last: serial position effects in the case contestants evaluate each other , 2010 .

[100]  Volker Benndorf,et al.  Competition in the Workplace: An Experimental Investigation , 2012 .

[101]  Achim Hauck,et al.  The euro area interbank market and the liquidity management of the eurosystem in the financial crisis , 2010 .

[102]  C. Pissarides,et al.  Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function , 2001 .

[103]  Gordon J. Klein,et al.  Bargaining power and local heroes , 2013 .

[104]  W. Strange,et al.  Mixed markets and crime , 2005 .

[105]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  Does Regulation of Built-In Security Reduce Crime? Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2010 .

[106]  Justus Haucap,et al.  Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization? , 2014 .