Optimal positive-operator-valued measures for unambiguous state discrimination

Optimization of the mean efficiency for unambiguous (or error free)discrimination among $N$ given linearly independent nonorthogonal states should be realized in a way to keep the probabilistic quantum mechanical interpretation. This imposes a condition on a certain matrix to be positive semidefinite. We reformulated this condition in such a way that the conditioned optimization problem for the mean efficiency was reduced to finding an unconditioned maximum of a function defined on a unit $N$-sphere for equiprobable states and on an $N$-ellipsoid if the states are given with different probabilities. We established that for equiprobable states a point on the sphere with equal values of Cartesian coordinates, which we call symmetric point, plays a special role. Sufficient conditions for a vector set are formulated for which the mean efficiency for equiprobable states takes its maximal value at the symmetric point. This set, in particular, includes previously studied symmetric states. A subset of symmetric states, for which the optimal measurement corresponds to a POVM requiring a one-dimensional ancilla space is constructed. We presented our constructions of a POVM suitable for the ancilla space dimension varying from 1 till $N$ and the Neumark's extension differing from the existing schemes by the property that it is straightforwardly applicable to the case when it is desirable to present the whole space system + ancilla as the tensor product of a two-dimensional ancilla space and the $N$-dimensional system space.

[1]  Daniel R. Terno,et al.  Optimal distinction between non-orthogonal quantum states , 1998, quant-ph/9804031.

[2]  D. Dieks Overlap and distinguishability of quantum states , 1988 .

[3]  S. Barnett,et al.  Optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent symmetric states , 1998, quant-ph/9807023.

[4]  Mark Hillery,et al.  Quantum filtering and discrimination between sets of Boolean functions. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[5]  A. Peres Neumark's theorem and quantum inseparability , 1990 .

[6]  J. Bergou,et al.  Optimal unambiguous discrimination of two subspaces as a case in mixed-state discrimination , 2006, quant-ph/0602093.

[7]  Yuan Feng,et al.  Mathematical nature of and a family of lower bounds for the success probability of unambiguous discrimination , 2002 .

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Semidefinite Programming , 1996, SIAM Rev..

[9]  C. Helstrom Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[10]  A. Holevo Statistical structure of quantum theory , 2001 .

[11]  M. Marcus,et al.  A Survey of Matrix Theory and Matrix Inequalities , 1965 .

[12]  I. D. Ivanović How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1987 .

[13]  C. Ross Found , 1869, The Dental register.

[14]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[15]  J. Bergou,et al.  Ancilla dimensions needed to carry out positive-operator-valued measurement , 2007 .

[16]  A. Shimony,et al.  Optimal distinction between two non-orthogonal quantum states , 1995 .

[17]  J. Bergou,et al.  Unambiguous discriminator for unknown quantum states: An implementation , 2007 .

[18]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[19]  A. Peres How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1988 .

[20]  G. Guo,et al.  Probabilistic Cloning and Identification of Linearly Independent Quantum States , 1998, quant-ph/9804064.

[21]  Xiang-Fa Zhou,et al.  Unambiguous discrimination of mixed states: A description based on system-ancilla coupling , 2006, quant-ph/0611095.

[22]  U. Günther,et al.  Naimark-dilated PT-symmetric brachistochrone. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[23]  Bing He,et al.  A general approach to physical realization of unambiguous quantum-state discrimination , 2006 .

[24]  J. Bergou,et al.  Optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent nonorthogonal quantum states and its optical realization , 2000, quant-ph/0012131.

[25]  Stig Stenholm,et al.  Generalized measurements of atomic qubits , 2001 .

[26]  János A. Bergou,et al.  Quantum state discrimination and selected applications , 2007 .