From a PMT-based to a SiPM-based PET system: a study to define matched acquisition/reconstruction parameters and NEMA performance of the Biograph Vision 450
暂无分享,去创建一个
Maurizio Conti | Bernard Bendriem | Ludovic Ferrer | Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré | Caroline Rousseau | Yanic Bercier | Thomas Carlier | Caroline Bodet-Milin
[1] K. Balakrishnan,et al. PET timing performance measurement method using NEMA NEC phantom , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).
[2] G. Delso,et al. Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] Nicola Belcari,et al. Medical applications of silicon photomultipliers , 2019, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment.
[5] L. Eriksson,et al. Estimating Image Quality for Future Generations of TOF PET Scanners , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[6] M. Conti. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[7] John O. Prior,et al. Phantom-based image quality assessment of clinical 18F-FDG protocols in digital PET/CT and comparison to conventional PMT-based PET/CT , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.
[8] S. Cherry,et al. Application of Silicon Photomultipliers to Positron Emission Tomography , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
[9] Gaspar Delso,et al. Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[10] Maurizio Conti,et al. An investigation of sensitivity limits in PET scanners , 2007 .
[11] D. Townsend,et al. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[12] J. Karp,et al. Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] Maurizio Conti,et al. Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[14] M. Conti. Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[15] Paul Kinahan,et al. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[16] T Carlier,et al. Clinical NECR in 18F-FDG PET scans: optimization of injected activity and variable acquisition time. Relationship with SNR , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[17] Max A. Viergever,et al. Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative 90Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.
[18] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..
[19] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements on the Biograph Vision PET/CT System: Initial Experiences and Comparison with the Biograph mCT , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.