Feeding Behavior Of Chrysoperla Cornea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) On Natural Diet Under The Laboratory Conditions

: Maximum mean number of hatching / egg survival (86.50±2.90) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora (75.25±2.28), Aphis gossypii (65.25±2.86) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(56.25±2.68). Lowest mean number of hatching / egg survival (43.00±2.48) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest mean larval survival/ no.of pupae (73.00±2.48) were recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora (67.00±3.93), Aphis gossypii (55.00±4.94) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(44.00±4.70). Lowest mean larval survival/ no.of pupae (20.00±1.87) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest pupal weight (0.07±1.79) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora Aphis gossypii and Rhopalosiphummaidis(0.04±1.31). Lowest mean pupal weight (0.03±2.06) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest pupal survival/no.of adult emergence (75.75±1.49) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora (65.50±2.39), Aphis gossypii (51.50±2.06) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(36.25±2.25). Lowest mean pupal survival/no. of adult emergence (12.75±1.10) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest male sex ratio was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora (21.50±0.95), Aphis gossypii (18.00±0.40) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(13.25±0.75). Lowest mean male sex ratio (4.75±0.47) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest female sex ratio (48.50±3.17) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora Aphis gossypii (23.25±0.62) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(19.25±1.10). mean female sex ratio (9.50±2.32) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae. Highest incubation was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae followed by Rhopalosiphummaidis(5.00±0.40), Aphis craccivora (4.00±0.40) and Aphis gossypii (3.75±0.47). Lowest mean incubation period (3.25±0.25) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on MyzuspersicaeHighest larval period (10.50±0.64) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae followed by Rhopalosiphummaidis (10.00±0.40), Aphis gossypii (8.25±0.62) and Aphis craccivora(8.00±0.40). Lowest mean larval period (7.00±0.25) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae. Highest pupal period (7.75±0.25) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae followed by Rhopalosiphummaidis (7.00±0.40), Aphis gossypii (5.50±0.28) and Aphis craccivora(5.25±0.47). Lowest mean pupal period (4.25±0.25) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae. Highest egg laying (2006.30±64.91) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Myzuspersicae followed by Aphis craccivora (1830.00±32.40), Aphis gossypii (1254.80±38.50) and Rhopalosiphummaidis(1020.80±56.26). Lowest mean egg laying (729.80±8.06) was recorded when the Chrysoperlacarnea fed on Aphis fabae.

[1]  M. Kabir,et al.  CONTROL OF MUSTARD APHID (Lipaphis erysimi) USING DIFFERENT BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES , 2015 .

[2]  D. Omar,et al.  Life table of the green lacewing Apertochrysa sp. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) reared on rice moth Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). , 2010 .

[3]  S. Nadeem,et al.  Use of gamma radiation for improving the mass production of Trichogramma chilonis and Chrysoperla carnea , 2009 .

[4]  R. Smith,et al.  Multiple Orifice Distribution System for Placing Green Lacewing Eggs into Verticel Larval Rearing Units , 2007, Journal of economic entomology.

[5]  Tian Juan,et al.  Functional response of the predator Scolothrips takahashii to hawthorn spider mite, Tetranychus viennensis: effect of age and temperature , 2007, BioControl.

[6]  E. Gomaa,et al.  Toxicity of some pesticides against the egg stage and the first larval instar of the chrysopid predatorChrysoperia carnea (Steph.) , 1994, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz.

[7]  R. Atlıhan,et al.  Feeding activity and life history characteristics of the generalist predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at different prey densities , 2004, Journal of Pest Science.

[8]  Yin-Fu Chang,et al.  Interpopulation variation in Chrysoperla carnea reproduction: implications for mass‐rearing and storage , 2000 .

[9]  S. Sarode,et al.  Influence of different prey species on biology of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens). , 2000 .

[10]  Paik ChaeHoon,et al.  Development of artificial diets for green lacewing, Chrysopa pallens (Rambur), by addition of natural products. , 2000 .

[11]  M. Raghuraman,et al.  Chrysopids biology on Corcyra cephalonica and feeding potential on different host insects. , 2000 .

[12]  C. Sturmbauer,et al.  Ecological parallelism and cryptic species in the genus Ophiothrix derived from mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[13]  A. Cohen,et al.  A New Concept in Artificial Diets forChrysoperla rufilabris: The Efficacy of Solid Diets1 , 1998 .

[14]  K. Daane,et al.  Inundative release of common green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to suppress Erythroneura variabilis and E. elegantula (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in vineyards , 1996 .

[15]  Yin-Fu Chang,et al.  Reproduction and quality of F1 offspring in Chrysoperla carnea: Differential influence of quiescence, artificially-induced diapause, and natural diapause , 1996 .

[16]  Yin-Fu Chang,et al.  Storage of the mass-produced predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): influence of photoperiod, temperature, and diet , 1995 .

[17]  G. M. Clarke,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry of invertebrate populations as a biological indicator of environmental quality. , 1993, Environmental pollution.

[18]  W. Bailey Acoustic Behaviour of Insects: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1990 .

[19]  D. Gerling,et al.  Bionomics of the Principal Natural Enemies Attacking Heliothis armigera in Cotton Fields in Israel , 1979 .

[20]  J. H. Brower Radiosensitivity of Tribolium destructor Uyttenboogaart (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) , 1975 .

[21]  M. Gonen,et al.  Effects of gamma radiation on Ephestia cautella (Wlk.) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae)—I. Effects on adults , 1971 .

[22]  K. Hagen,et al.  A Method of Providing Artificial Diets to Chrysopa Larvae , 1965 .