E‐learning challenges in the Arab world: revelations from a case study profile

The overwhelming traditional knowledge delivery system for higher education in the Arab world demonstrates the pronounced information technology (IT) gap between Arab countries and the developed world. This study demonstrates the problems and possibilities of implementing e‐learning in Arab educational institutions through analysing the attitudes of university professors (n = 294) in Lebanon towards three a priori e‐learning dimensions. Favourable attitudes towards e‐learning attested to faculty members’ interest to get engaged in a fully‐fledged e‐learning programme in a country where the primary delivery educational model is essentially traditional. Discusses these attitudes in the light of the social, political and economic hindrances that impede the implementation of e‐learning in the Arab region. A series of K‐independent Kruskal‐Wallis tests yielded significant attitudinal variations between males and females as well as between computer daily users and occasional users. Furthermore, daily computer users documented more favourable attitudes towards e‐learning than their occasional user counterparts. Offers recommendations for the implementation of e‐learning in “traditionally” demarcated educational systems in countries where the deployment of information and communications technologies is not widespread.

[1]  M. Mclaughlin.  The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities , 1990 .

[2]  Joanne M. Badagliacco,et al.  Gender and Race Differences in Computing Attitudes and Experience , 1990 .

[3]  John O'Malley,et al.  Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom , 1999 .

[4]  Ramzi Nasser,et al.  Problems and the Epistemology of Electronic Publishing in the Arab World: The Case of Lebanon , 2001, First Monday.

[5]  D. Matthews.  The Origins of Distance Education and Its Use in the United States , 1999 .

[6]  Helen M. Doerr,et al.  Creating a Virtual Classroom for Interactive Education on the Web , 1995, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[7]  Larry Cuban.  Reforming Again, Again, and Again , 1990 .

[8]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[9]  Ramzi Nasser,et al.  Attitudes and Concerns towards Distance Education: The Case of Lebanon , 2000 .

[10]  John P. Charlton,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Computer Apathy and Anxiety Scale , 1995 .

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[12]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  D. Keegan.  On Defining Distance Education , 1980, Distance Education: International Perspectives.

[14]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs about Using Educational Technology in the Science Classroom. , 1999 .

[15]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers , 1993 .

[16]  Lorraine Sherry,et al.  An Assessment of Training Needs in the Use of Distance Education for Instruction , 1995 .

[17]  Todd Oppenheimer,et al.  The Computer Delusion. , 1997 .

[18]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  What''s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning , 1999 .

[19]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[20]  J. Church.  Human Development Report , 2001 .