Large-Domain, Low-Contrast Acoustic Inverse Scattering for Ultrasound Breast Imaging

We present a full-wave acoustic inverse-scattering algorithm designed specifically for ultrasonic breast imaging. At ultrasonic frequencies, the image domain is roughly tens to hundreds of λmin cubed, where λmin is the smallest wavelength in the transmit signal spectrum. The expected range of contrasts for the breast imaging problem for density, compressibility, and compressive loss is ±20% of the background. Because of the low contrast, Born iterations provide the basic structure of the inverse-scattering algorithm. However, we use a multiobjective covariance-based least squares cost function in place of the basic least squares cost function to estimate the contrast functions. This cost function provides physically meaningful regularization based on a priori knowledge of the contrasts. Also, due to the size of the imaging domain and because the objects to be imaged are low contrast and inhomogeneous, we use the Neumann series solution as the forward solver. The largest domain imaged in simulation was 50λmin × 50 λmin in 2-D.

[1]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Comparison of the born iterative method and tarantola's method for an electromagnetic time‐domain inverse problem , 1991, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[2]  Francesco Simonetti,et al.  Transmission and Reflection Diffraction Tomography in Breast Imaging , 2008, 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.

[3]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  X. Li,et al.  Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: localization of tumors in three dimensions , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  S. S. Chaudhary,et al.  Dielectric properties of normal & malignant human breast tissues at radiowave & microwave frequencies. , 1984, Indian journal of biochemistry & biophysics.

[6]  A. Devaney A Filtered Backpropagation Algorithm for Diffraction Tomography , 1982 .

[7]  L Landini,et al.  Frequency-dependent attenuation in breast tissue characterization. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Study of resolution and super resolution in electromagnetic imaging for half-space problems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Olsi Rama,et al.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment. , 2005, Medical physics.

[10]  Cuiping Li,et al.  Breast Imaging Using Transmission Ultrasound: Reconstructing Tissue Parameters of Sound Speed and Attenuation , 2008, 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.

[11]  A Heinig,et al.  Direct Measurement of Sound Velocity in Various Specimens of Breast Tissue , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  New Approximate Formulations for EM Scattering , 2004 .

[13]  W. Chew,et al.  New approximate formulations for EM scattering by dielectric objects , 2004 .

[14]  T. Douglas Mast Two- and three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic propagation through human breast tissue , 2002 .

[15]  M Moghaddam,et al.  Variable density linear acoustic inverse problem. , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  P. Rocca,et al.  Evolutionary optimization as applied to inverse scattering problems , 2009 .

[17]  D. A. Palmer,et al.  High‐speed data acquisition in a diffraction tomography system employing large‐scale toroidal arrays , 1997 .

[18]  C. Lu,et al.  Image Reconstruction with Acoustic Measurement Using Distorted Born Iteration Method , 1996 .

[19]  Xu Li,et al.  Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early detection of breast cancer , 2003 .

[20]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[21]  Panagiotis Kosmas,et al.  Three-Dimensional Microwave Breast Imaging: Dispersive Dielectric Properties Estimation Using Patient-Specific Basis Functions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Emmanuel P. Papadakis,et al.  Ultrasonic Instruments and Devices , 2001 .

[23]  P. M. Berg,et al.  A contrast source inversion method , 1997 .

[24]  A. Massa,et al.  Improved microwave imaging procedure for nondestructive evaluations of two-dimensional structures , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[25]  F. Duck Physical properties of tissue , 1990 .

[26]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast , 2000 .

[27]  P. M. Berg,et al.  Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method , 2002 .

[28]  P L Carson,et al.  Lesion detectability in ultrasonic computed tomography of symptomatic breast patients. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[29]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Two nonlinear inverse methods for electromagnetic induction measurements , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[30]  T. D. Mast,et al.  A k-space method for large-scale models of wave propagation in tissue , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[31]  Lorenzo Crocco,et al.  New tools and series for forward and inverse scattering problems in lossy media , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[32]  W. Chew Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media , 1990 .

[33]  S. Norton Iterative inverse scattering algorithms: Methods of computing Fréchet derivatives , 1999 .

[34]  Yang Xu,et al.  Breast Imaging with Ultrasound Tomography: Clinical Results at the Karmanos Cancer Institute , 2008, 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.

[35]  Nebojsa Duric,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound tomography methods in circular geometry , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[36]  T. D. Mast Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues , 2000 .

[37]  A. Morelli Inverse Problem Theory , 2010 .

[38]  Stuchly,et al.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  M. Oelze,et al.  Density imaging using inverse scattering. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Zhong Qing Zhang,et al.  Active microwave imaging. I. 2-D forward and inverse scattering methods , 2002 .

[41]  T. Isernia,et al.  Degree of nonlinearity and a new solution procedure in scalar two-dimensional inverse scattering problems. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Simultaneous inversion of compressibility and density in the acoustic inverse problem , 1993 .

[43]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Nonlinear Microwave Imaging for Breast-Cancer Screening Using Gauss–Newton's Method and the CGLS Inversion Algorithm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[44]  Peter M. van den Berg,et al.  Convergent Born series for large refractive indices , 1990 .

[45]  H. Engl,et al.  Regularization of Inverse Problems , 1996 .

[46]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Three-dimensional nonlinear image reconstruction for microwave biomedical imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Manuel Benedetti,et al.  An Innovative Microwave-Imaging Technique for Nondestructive Evaluation: Applications to Civil Structures Monitoring and Biological Bodies Inspection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[48]  P. M. Berg,et al.  Extended contrast source inversion , 1999 .