Investigation of the elastic modulus, tensile and flexural strength of five skull simulant materials for impact testing of a forensic skin/skull/brain model.

Conducting in vitro research for forensic, impact and injury simulation modelling generally involves the use of a skull simulant with mechanical properties similar to those found in the human skull. For this study epoxy resin, fibre filled epoxy resin, 3D-printing filaments (PETG, PLA) and self-cure acrylic denture base resin were used to fabricate the specimens (n=20 per material group), according to ISO 527-2 IBB and ISO20795-1. Tensile and flexural testing in a universal testing machine was used to measure their tensile/flexural elastic modulus and strength. The results showed that the epoxy resin and fibre filled epoxy resin had similar tensile elastic moduli (no statistical significant difference) with lower values observed for the other materials. The fibre filled epoxy resin had a considerably higher flexural elastic modulus and strength, possibly attributed to the presence of fibres. Of the simulants tested, epoxy resin had an elastic modulus and flexural strength close to that of mean human skull values reported in the literature, and thus can be considered as a suitable skull simulant for a skin/skull/brain model for lower impact forces that do not exceed the fracture stress. For higher impact forces a 3D printing filament (PLA) may be a more suitable skull simulant material, due to its closer match to fracture stresses found in human skull bone. Influencing factors were also anisotropy, heterogeneity and viscoelasticity of human skull bone and simulant specimens.

[1]  Jack C. Roberts,et al.  Grand Challenge: Computational Models Validated Against Critical Experiments , 2013, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[2]  Eric Markiewicz,et al.  Experimental study of the bone behaviour of the human skull bone for the development of a physical head model , 2007 .

[3]  Pascal Drazetic,et al.  Identification des lois de comportement du crâne à partir d'essais de flexion , 2003 .

[4]  S. Herring,et al.  Illustrated anatomy of the head and neck , 2007 .

[5]  U Zollinger,et al.  The "skin-skull-brain model": a new instrument for the study of gunshot effects. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[6]  D. Berckmans,et al.  Biomechanics of frontal skull fracture. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  David F. Moore,et al.  Overview of TBI , 2012 .

[8]  Vijaykumar N Chalwa,et al.  Mechanical Property of Glass Fiber Reinforcement Epoxy Composites , 2013 .

[9]  Justin W. Fernandez,et al.  Evaluating Simulant Materials for Understanding Cranial Backspatter from a Ballistic Projectile , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  P. Verschueren,et al.  The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  K. Ramesh.  High Strain Ra 33 . High Strain Rate and Impact Experiments , 2017 .

[12]  Plastics - Determination of tensile properties , 2022 .

[13]  K. Pickering,et al.  High performance aligned short natural fibre – Epoxy composites , 2016 .

[14]  E S GURDJIAN,et al.  The mechanism of skull fracture. , 1950, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  Mechanical properties on cranial bone. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Flexure of layered cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. L. Wood,et al.  Dynamic response of human cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  D. H. Robbins,et al.  Determination of mechanical properties of the bones of the skull , 1969 .

[19]  M. Swain,et al.  A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  Andrew C. Merkle,et al.  Development of a Human Cranial Bone Surrogate for Impact Studies , 2013, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[21]  E S GURDJIAN,et al.  The mechanism of skull fracture. , 1950, Radiology.

[22]  M. Swain,et al.  A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[23]  A. C. Merkle,et al.  Human Surrogate Head Response to Dynamic Overpressure Loading in Protected and Unprotected Conditions , 2010 .