Fine‐scale genetic structure and dispersal in the common vole (Microtus arvalis)

The genetic structure and demography of local populations is tightly linked to the rate and scale of dispersal. Dispersal parameters are notoriously difficult to determine in the field, and remain often completely unknown for smaller organisms. In this study, we investigate spatial and temporal genetic structure in relation to dispersal patterns among local populations of the probably most abundant European mammals, the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Voles were studied in six natural populations at distances of 0.4–2.5 km in three different seasons (fall, spring, summer) corresponding to different life‐history stages. Field observations provided no direct evidence for movements of individuals between populations. The analysis of 10 microsatellite markers revealed a persistent overall genetic structure among populations of 2.9%, 2.5% and 3%FST in the respective season. Pairwise comparisons showed that even the closest populations were significantly differentiated from each other in each season, but there was no evidence for temporal differentiation within populations or isolation by distance among populations. Despite significant genetic structure, assignment analyses identified a relatively high proportion of individuals as being immigrants for the population where they were captured. The immigration rate was not significantly lower for females than for males. We suggest that a generally low and sex‐dependent effective dispersal rate as the consequence of only few immigrants reproducing successfully in the new populations together with the social structure within populations may explain the maintenance of genetic differentiation among populations despite migration.

[1]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis , 2005, Evolutionary bioinformatics online.

[2]  R. Vitalis.  Sex‐specific genetic differentiation and coalescence times: estimating sex‐biased dispersal rates , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[3]  A. Konečný,et al.  Fast sex identification in wild mammals using PCR amplification of the Sry gene , 2003 .

[4]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Mitochondrial gene diversity in the common vole Microtus arvalis shaped by historical divergence and local adaptations , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[5]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Sex‐related spatial kin structure in a spring population of grey‐sided voles Clethrionomys rufocanus as revealed by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[6]  F. Rousset.  Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. , 1997, Genetics.

[7]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  S. Piertney,et al.  Isolation and characterization of highly polymorphic microsatellites in the water vole, Arvicola terrestris. , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[9]  G. Gerlach,et al.  Fragmentation of Landscape as a Cause for Genetic Subdivision in Bank Voles , 2000 .

[10]  P. Waser,et al.  Gene dispersal and outbreeding in a philopatric mammal , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[11]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the grey red‐backed vole Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[12]  O. Rhodes,et al.  Effective sizes for subdivided populations. , 1993, Genetics.

[13]  S. Piertney,et al.  Metapopulation genetic structure in the water vole, Arvicola terrestris, in NE Scotland , 1999 .

[14]  M. Bullejos,et al.  High sequence identity between the SRY HMG box from humans and insectivores , 1996, Mammalian Genome.

[15]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[16]  Stephanie Manel,et al.  Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment , 2001, Nature.

[18]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Computer programs for population genetics data analysis: a survival guide , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Mammalian monogamy is not controlled by a single gene. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Medrano,et al.  Amplification of the Zfy and Zfx Genes for Sex Identification in Humans, Cattle, Sheep and Goats , 1990, Bio/Technology.

[21]  J. Goudet,et al.  Tests for sex‐biased dispersal using bi‐parentally inherited genetic markers , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[22]  J. Gipps.  Biology of New World Microtus, Robert H. Tamarin (Ed.). The American Society of Mammalogists, Minneapolis Minnesota (1985), xiii , 1987 .

[23]  M. Gaines,et al.  Natal philopatry and breeding systems in voles(Microtus spp.). , 1987 .

[24]  Nicolas Ray,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Recent Migration Rates After a Spatial Expansion , 2005, Genetics.

[25]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  GENETIC STRUCTURE AND COLONIZATION PROCESSES IN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS OF THE COMMON VOLE, MICROTUS ARVALIS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  G. McCracken,et al.  ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[28]  Khalid Belkhir,et al.  IDENTIX , a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods , 2002 .

[29]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[30]  Rolf A Ims,et al.  Population Dynamic and Genetic Consequences of Spatial Density‐Dependent Dispersal in Patchy Populations , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[31]  O. Berry,et al.  Can assignment tests measure dispersal? , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[32]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[33]  P. Fontanillas,et al.  ESTIMATING SEX‐SPECIFIC DISPERSAL RATES WITH AUTOSOMAL MARKERS IN HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  J. Aars,et al.  Widespread gene flow and high genetic variability in populations of water voles Arvicola terrestris in patchy habitats , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[35]  Y. Yoshinaga,et al.  Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the field vole Microtus montebelli. , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[36]  J. Jacob.  Short-term effects of farming practices on populations of common voles , 2003 .

[37]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Cross-species amplification of microsatellite DNA in Old World microtine rodents with PCR primers for the gray-sided vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus , 1997 .

[38]  S. Piertney,et al.  Parentage assignment detects frequent and large‐scale dispersal in water voles , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[39]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[40]  J. Cornuet,et al.  GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. , 2004, The Journal of heredity.

[41]  Jesse L. Boyce,et al.  Population Biology of Microtus arvalis. III. Regulation of Numbers and Breeding Dispersion of Females , 1988 .

[42]  D. Kruska.  Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas , 2005 .

[43]  D. Hosken,et al.  Population cycles of small rodents are caused by specialist predators : or are they ? , 2003 .

[44]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  F. Prugnolle,et al.  Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review , 2002, Heredity.

[46]  I. Stirling,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[47]  R. Chesser,et al.  Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations. , 1991, Genetics.

[48]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real‐time estimation of migration rate: a simulation‐based exploration of accuracy and power , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[49]  M. Galan,et al.  Genetic structure of the cyclic fossorial water vole (Arvicola terrestris): landscape and demographic influences , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[50]  Christine C. K. Boyce,et al.  POPULATION BIOLOGY OF MICROTUS ARVALIS. II. NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL OF FEMALES , 1988 .

[51]  Polymorphic trinucleotide microsatellite loci for a neotropical parrot, the green-rumped parrotlet, Forpus passerinus. , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[52]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. , 1992, Genetics.

[53]  Jacques Hausser,et al.  Säugetiere der Schweiz : Verbreitung, Biologie, Ökologie , 1995 .

[54]  P. Boag,et al.  MICROGEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF MEADOW VOLES (MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS) IN RELATION TO POPULATION DENSITY , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  David R. Bowne,et al.  Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[56]  R. Apeldoorn,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure and genetic differentiation within and between populations of the root vole, Microtus oeconomus in the Netherlands , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[57]  Jinliang Wang,et al.  Application of the One‐Migrant‐per‐Generation Rule to Conservation and Management , 2004 .

[58]  Jan Zima,et al.  The Atlas of European Mammals , 1999 .