Using trained dogs and organic semi-conducting sensors to identify asymptomatic and mild SARS-CoV-2 infections: an observational study

Abstract Background A rapid, accurate, non-invasive diagnostic screen is needed to identify people with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated whether organic semi-conducting (OSC) sensors and trained dogs could distinguish between people infected with asymptomatic or mild symptoms, and uninfected individuals, and the impact of screening at ports-of-entry. Methods Odour samples were collected from adults, and SARS-CoV-2 infection status confirmed using RT-PCR. OSC sensors captured the volatile organic compound (VOC) profile of odour samples. Trained dogs were tested in a double-blind trial to determine their ability to detect differences in VOCs between infected and uninfected individuals, with sensitivity and specificity as the primary outcome. Mathematical modelling was used to investigate the impact of bio-detection dogs for screening. Results About, 3921 adults were enrolled in the study and odour samples collected from 1097 SARS-CoV-2 infected and 2031 uninfected individuals. OSC sensors were able to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and uninfected, with sensitivity from 98% (95% CI 95–100) to 100% and specificity from 99% (95% CI 97–100) to 100%. Six dogs were able to distinguish between samples with sensitivity ranging from 82% (95% CI 76–87) to 94% (95% CI 89–98) and specificity ranging from 76% (95% CI 70–82) to 92% (95% CI 88–96). Mathematical modelling suggests that dog screening plus a confirmatory PCR test could detect up to 89% of SARS-CoV-2 infections, averting up to 2.2 times as much transmission compared to isolation of symptomatic individuals only. Conclusions People infected with SARS-CoV-2, with asymptomatic or mild symptoms, have a distinct odour that can be identified by sensors and trained dogs with a high degree of accuracy. Odour-based diagnostics using sensors and/or dogs may prove a rapid and effective tool for screening large numbers of people. Trial Registration NCT04509713 (clinicaltrials.gov).

[1]  M. Malim,et al.  Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study , 2021, The Lancet Microbe.

[2]  R. Berk,et al.  Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 infected patient samples by detection dogs: A proof of concept study , 2021, PloS one.

[3]  B. Cowling,et al.  Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[4]  A. Charlett,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by viral load, S gene variants and demographic factors and the utility of lateral flow devices to prevent transmission , 2021, medRxiv.

[5]  Muhammad Ali,et al.  Emerging concerns regarding COVID‐19; second wave and new variant , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[6]  M. Manns,et al.  Scent dog identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections, similar across different body fluids , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  M. Malim,et al.  Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests demonstrates their utility for high sensitivity detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens , 2021, medRxiv.

[8]  I. Buchan,et al.  Clarifying the evidence on SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests in public health responses to COVID-19 , 2021, The Lancet.

[9]  D. Grandjean,et al.  Use Of Canine Olfactory Detection For COVID-19 Testing Study On U.A.E. Trained Detection Dog Sensitivity , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  Elisabeth Mahase Covid-19: What new variants are emerging and how are they being investigated? , 2021, BMJ.

[11]  Harry D. Nuttall,et al.  COVID-19: Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing , 2021, EClinicalMedicine.

[12]  D. Grandjean,et al.  Can the detection dog alert on COVID-19 positive persons by sniffing axillary sweat samples? A proof-of-concept study , 2020, PloS one.

[13]  Reza Laripour,et al.  Sniffer dogs as a screening/diagnostic tool for COVID-19: a proof of concept study , 2020, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[14]  Naomi R. Waterlow,et al.  Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[15]  I. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Could bio-detection dogs be used to limit the spread of COVID-19 by travellers? , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[16]  M. Reed,et al.  Diagnosis of COVID-19 by analysis of breath with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry - a feasibility study , 2020, EClinicalMedicine.

[17]  M. Manns,et al.  Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study , 2020, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[18]  Andrés F. Valencia,et al.  Dog Savior: Immediate Scent-Detection of SARS-COV-2 by Trained Dogs , 2020, bioRxiv.

[19]  D. Grandjean,et al.  Detection dogs as a help in the detection of COVID-19 Can the dog alert on COVID-19 positive persons by sniffing axillary sweat samples ? Proof-of-concept study , 2020, bioRxiv.

[20]  N. Low,et al.  False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review , 2020, medRxiv.

[21]  Riley O. Mummah,et al.  Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19 , 2020, eLife.

[22]  S. Lindsay,et al.  Trained dogs identify people with malaria parasites by their odour. , 2019, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[23]  W. Wieland-Alter,et al.  Volatile fingerprinting of human respiratory viruses from cell culture , 2018, Journal of breath research.

[24]  Y. Zeiri,et al.  Volatile organic compounds generated by cultures of bacteria and viruses associated with respiratory infections. , 2015, Biomedical chromatography : BMC.

[25]  M. Schivo,et al.  Volatile emanations from in vitro airway cells infected with human rhinovirus , 2014, Journal of breath research.

[26]  N. Rooney,et al.  Investigation into the Value of Trained Glycaemia Alert Dogs to Clients with Type I Diabetes , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Malina K. Storer,et al.  Effect of the influenza A (H1N1) live attenuated intranasal vaccine on nitric oxide (FENO) and other volatiles in exhaled breath , 2011, Journal of breath research.

[28]  T. Walles,et al.  Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon , 2011, European Respiratory Journal.

[29]  J. Suarez,et al.  Naturalistic quantification of canine olfactory sensitivity , 2006 .

[30]  C. Willis,et al.  Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  L. Joseph,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Modeling the Conditional Dependence Between Multiple Diagnostic Tests , 2001, Biometrics.

[32]  Preliminary report from the Joint PHE Porton Down & University of Oxford SARS-CoV-2 test development and validation cell: Rapid evaluation of Lateral Flow Viral Antigen detection devices , 2020 .