Visualizing Decisionmaking: Perspectives on Collaborative and Participative Approach to Sustainable Urban Planning and Management

Over the last two decades shifting human resources, socioeconomic potentials, and innovations in information technology and communication have all but overthrown the formal order of the planning and management of urban systems. The authors trace the causes to misplaced priorities in urban governance and related issues, via the interface of infrastructure systems and land use. They survey some major theoretical and applied decision-support systems collaborative planning systems, and collaborative decision-support systems which have been advanced to date, indicating their strengths and weaknesses with regard to their ability to anchor public participation and professional collaboration in key planning and management issues. They highlight the fact that, although relevant multivariate, disaggregated, and incoherent small-scale researches do yield high dividends, their lack of cohesive interrelationship is related to the fragmentation of urban systems—despite various attempts at bringing about sustainable development. They suggest that decisionmaking can be effective when all aspects involved are visually related and collectively executed. They conclude by emphasizing that a comprehensive approach needs to be adopted for the planning and management of urban centers in order to enhance systems performance, human interaction, and contained developments.

[1]  Stephen Graham,et al.  CONSTRUCTING PREMIUM NETWORK SPACES: REFLECTIONS ON INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS AND CONTEMPORARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT. IN: MOVING PEOPLE, GOODS, AND INFORMATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE CUTTING-EDGE INFRASTRUCTURES OF NETWORKED CITIES , 2000 .

[2]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Design Considerations for Space and Time Distributed Collaborative Spatial Decision Making , 1997 .

[3]  Michael J. Shiffer,et al.  Interactive Multimedia Planning Support: Moving from Stand-Alone Systems to the World Wide Web , 1995 .

[4]  A Hudson-Smith,et al.  Visual communication in urban planning and urban design , 1998 .

[5]  Masahide Horita,et al.  Mapping Policy Discourse with CRANES: Spatial Understanding Support Systems as a Medium for Community Conflict Resolution , 2000 .

[6]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Development of Parking Demand Models in Hong Kong , 2000 .

[7]  Philip Berke,et al.  Planning for Sustainable Development: Measuring Progress in Plans , 2002 .

[8]  P. Waddell A Behavioral Simulation Model for Metropolitan Policy Analysis and Planning: Residential Location and Housing Market Components of Urbansim , 2000 .

[9]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .

[10]  Brenda K. Laurel,et al.  Interface as Mimesis , 1986 .

[11]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Visualizing the City: Communicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision-Makers , 2001 .

[12]  Michael Batty,et al.  The New Urban Geography of the Third Dimension , 2000 .

[13]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Management of Recreational Areas: GIS, Autonomous Agents, and Virtual Reality , 2000 .

[14]  Neil Ravenscroft,et al.  Leisure, Property, and the Viability of Town Centres , 2000 .

[15]  Lale Berköz,et al.  Location of Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate Firms in Istanbul , 2000 .

[16]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  How land-use-transportation models work , 2000 .

[17]  Brook Cowen,et al.  Reaching the Urban Poor with Private Infrastructure , 1999 .

[18]  Michael J. Shiffer,et al.  Towards a Collaborative Planning System , 1992 .

[19]  Paul Selman Networks of knowledge and influence: connecting 'the planners' and 'the planned' , 2000 .

[20]  Bin Jiang,et al.  New technologies for urban designers: the venue project. Technology Applications Programme (JTAP) Working Paper 21 , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Batty “A Slow Sort of Country!” Said the Queen , 2000 .

[22]  Luca Bertolini Planning in the borderless city. A conceptualisation and an application to the case of station area redevelopment , 2000 .

[23]  Daniel J. Evans A behavioral simulation model for metropolitan policy analysis and planning: residential location and housing market components of UrbanSim , 1999 .

[24]  Bernard Fingleton Spatial Econometrics, Economic Geography, Dynamics and Equilibrium: A ‘Third Way’? , 2000 .

[25]  John Pløger,et al.  Public Participation and the Art of Governance , 2001 .

[26]  G. D. Roo Environmental conflicts in compact cities : complexity, decisionmaking, and policy approaches , 2000 .

[27]  Barrie Needham Spatial Planning as a Design Discipline: A Paradigm for Western Europe? , 2000 .

[28]  Roxanne Warren,et al.  Planning Criteria for Automated People Movers: Defining the Issues , 2000 .

[29]  J. Pinto,et al.  Information Sharing in an Interorganizational GIS Environment , 2000 .

[30]  Steven Flusty,et al.  Thrashing Downtown: Play as resistance to the spatial and representational regulation of Los Angeles , 2000 .

[31]  Bo-sin Tang,et al.  Modelling planning control decisions: A logistic regression analysis on office development applications in urban Kowloon, Hong Kong , 2000 .