A General Applicable Sphygmogram Discriminator for Detecting Arrhythmia & Motion Artifact

Sphygmogram (SPG) signal is one of common physiological signals with abundant pathological information. It has been widely used in monitoring heart rate, blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, even prediagnosis according to the standpoint of haemodynamics and Traditional Chinese Medicine. However, radial pulse signal acquisition is easily effected by patient’s artifacts, e.g. body movement. Groups of researchers have studied and applied kinds of methods to restrain and weed the undesired influence caused by motion. However, the filtered results lose much useful and valuable information like arrhythmia. Even though some scientists have noticed this point, their methods still have limitation in batch data. In this paper, a general applicable method aiming of distinguishing SPG signal with arrhythmia and motion artifact is proposed. Taking advantage of physiological characterization vectors and similarity analysis, the accuracy and error rate could reach 94.74% and 5.56%, respectively.

[1]  N H Lovell,et al.  Signal quality measures for pulse oximetry through waveform morphology analysis , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Peng Un Mak,et al.  A novel intelligent sphygmogram analyzer for health monitoring of cardiovascular system , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Thomas G. Holzman Computer-human interface solutions for emergency medical care , 1999, INTR.

[4]  T. Tamura,et al.  Development of the irregular pulse detection method in daily life using wearable photoplethysmographic sensor , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Guo Ran,et al.  Morphologic Distortion Percolator for Radial Pulse Signal Acquisition towards Wearable Monitoring Device , 2014 .

[6]  Mang I Vai,et al.  On an automatic delineator for arterial blood pressure waveforms , 2010, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[7]  Jo Woon Chong,et al.  Photoplethysmograph Signal Reconstruction Based on a Novel Hybrid Motion Artifact Detection–Reduction Approach. Part I: Motion and Noise Artifact Detection , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Emil Jovanov,et al.  Issues in wearable computing for medical monitoring applications: a case study of a wearable ECG monitoring device , 2000, Digest of Papers. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[9]  Thad Starner,et al.  The Challenges of Wearable Computing: Part 1 , 2001, IEEE Micro.

[10]  J. Rodgers,et al.  Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient , 1988 .