The notion of the motion: The neurocognition of motion lines in visual narratives

Motion lines appear ubiquitously in graphic representation to depict the path of a moving object, most popularly in comics. Some researchers have argued that these graphic signs directly tie to the "streaks" appearing in the visual system when a viewer tracks an object (Burr, 2000), despite the fact that previous studies have been limited to offline measurements. Here, we directly examine the cognition of motion lines by comparing images in comic strips that depicted normal motion lines with those that either had no lines or anomalous, reversed lines. In Experiment 1, shorter viewing times appeared to images with normal lines than those with no lines, which were shorter than those with anomalous lines. In Experiment 2, measurements of event-related potentials (ERPs) showed that, compared to normal lines, panels with no lines elicited a posterior positivity that was distinct from the frontal positivity evoked by anomalous lines. These results suggested that motion lines aid in the comprehension of depicted events. LORETA source localization implicated greater activation of visual and language areas when understanding was made more difficult by anomalous lines. Furthermore, in both experiments, participants' experience reading comics modulated these effects, suggesting motion lines are not tied to aspects of the visual system, but rather are conventionalized parts of the "vocabulary" of the visual language of comics.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  An event-related potential study on the observation of erroneous everyday actions , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Takatsune Kumada,et al.  Measuring Brain Activities Related to Understanding Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) , 2007, HCI.

[4]  A. D. Manning,et al.  Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art , 1993 .

[5]  Neil Cohn,et al.  The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. , 2013 .

[6]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Differential Electrophysiological Signatures of Semantic and Syntactic Scene Processing , 2013, Psychological science.

[8]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Attention as a Cognitive and Neural System , 1992 .

[9]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Outline Picture Perception by the Songe of Papua , 1975 .

[12]  John Ross,et al.  Direct Evidence That “Speedlines” Influence Motion Mechanisms , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Neil Cohn,et al.  (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Donna Coch,et al.  Motion and color processing in school-age children and adults: an ERP study. , 2005, Developmental science.

[15]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion vision: Are ‘speed lines’ used in human visual motion? , 2000, Current Biology.

[16]  K. Rosengren,et al.  Children's understanding of action lines and the static representation of speed of locomotion. , 1991, Child development.

[17]  Jennifer Green,et al.  Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories , 2014 .

[18]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[19]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[21]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[22]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[23]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Working‐memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension , 1991 .

[24]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[26]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  A. Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantics and cognition. , 2006, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[28]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Memory displacement of an object with motion lines , 2007 .

[29]  ROBERT M. CHAPMAN,et al.  Evoked Responses to Numerical and Non-Numerical Visual Stimuli while Problem Solving , 1964, Nature.

[30]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  W. Prinz,et al.  N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[32]  C Carello,et al.  Static Depiction of Movement , 1986, Perception.

[33]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) : review, new comparisons, and new validation , 2002 .

[34]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Visual cognition of "speed lines" in comics: Experimental study on speed perception , 2012, CogSci.

[36]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[37]  Barbara J. Shwalb,et al.  Applied developmental psychology : theory, practice, and research from Japan , 2005 .

[38]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Visual Narrative Structure , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Musical structure is processed in “language” areas of the brain: a possible role for Brodmann Area 47 in temporal coherence , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  A Super cial Resemblance Does Not Necessarily Mean You Are Part of the Family : Counterarguments to Coulson , King and Kutas ( 1998 ) in the P 600 / SPS-P 300 Debate , 2004 .

[41]  M. Raichle,et al.  Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography , 1991, Nature.

[42]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. , 1992, Psychological review.

[43]  S. Friedman,et al.  Developmental changes in the understanding of implied motion in two-dimensional pictures. , 1975, Child development.

[44]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Prediction, events, and the advantage of Agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[46]  P. Holcomb,et al.  In: Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. , 2007 .

[47]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[48]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Using Goal- and Grip-Related Information for Understanding the Correctness of Other’s Actions: An ERP Study , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  F. Manes,et al.  N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[50]  Neil Cohn,et al.  The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Hiroyuki Ito,et al.  Motion Impressions Enhanced by Converging Motion Lines , 2010, Perception.

[52]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Meaning, presence and absence in pictures , 1990 .

[53]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  N. Munn Walbiri Graphic Signs: An Analysis1 , 1962 .

[55]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[56]  G Francis,et al.  A Computational and Perceptual Account of Motion Lines , 1998, Perception.

[57]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[58]  J. Zacks Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Human Comprehension , 2008 .

[60]  P. Brooks,et al.  The role of action lines in children's memory for pictures ☆ , 1977 .

[61]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[62]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Representation of dynamic events triggered by motion lines and static human postures , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[64]  Neil Cohn,et al.  You're a Good Structure, Charlie Brown: The Distribution of Narrative Categories in Comic Strips , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.