Efficient VM Selection Heuristics for Dynamic VM Consolidation in Cloud Datacenters

Dynamic Consolidation of Virtual Machines (VMs) in a cloud data center requires live migration of VMs from over-utilized hosts. A primary but relatively an ignored part of consolidation process is the efficient selection of Virtual Machines from an over-utilized host for migration. Two VM selection policies, Threshold Based Selection (TBS) and Capacity Based Selection (CBS), have been proposed in this paper. These policies are based on the idea of simultaneously minimizing multiple factors that contribute to the degradation of the quality of service due to consolidation. Three degrading factors considered in the policies are, the time duration of VM migrations, time duration hosts remain over-utilized and the total number of migrations required for consolidation. Cost functions, involving these degrading factors, have been provided which formed the bases for TBS and CBS. TBS is an efficient VM selection mechanism that focuses more on the time duration of VM migrations and the total number of migrations required for the consolidation process as a trade-off between the three degrading factors. On the other hand, CBS is another efficient mechanism with more emphasis on reducing the time duration for which hosts remain over-utilized. Experiment results obtained by using Cloudsim simulating toolkit have shown that our proposed policies outperformed conventional VM selection policies like MMT, MU, and RC on indicators such as energy consumption, SLA violations, and overall performance efficiency.

[1]  M. Nijsse Multiple correlation coefficient. , 1991, Biometrics.

[2]  Gamal Eldin I. Selim,et al.  An efficient resource utilization technique for consolidation of virtual machines in cloud computing environments , 2016, 2016 33rd National Radio Science Conference (NRSC).

[3]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in Cloud data centers , 2012, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[4]  Joaquim Celestino,et al.  VBalance: A selection policy of virtual machines for load balancing in cloud computing , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).

[5]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms , 2011, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[6]  Keqin Li,et al.  Virtual Machine Placement Algorithm for Both Energy-Awareness and SLA Violation Reduction in Cloud Data Centers , 2016, Sci. Program..

[7]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Article in Press Future Generation Computer Systems ( ) – Future Generation Computer Systems Cloud Computing and Emerging It Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th Utility , 2022 .

[8]  Zhigang Hu,et al.  A novel virtual machine deployment algorithm with energy efficiency in cloud computing , 2015 .

[9]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Cost of Virtual Machine Live Migration in Clouds: A Performance Evaluation , 2009, CloudCom.

[10]  Shoubin Dong,et al.  Dynamic VM Consolidation for Energy-Aware and SLA Violation Reduction in Cloud Computing , 2012, 2012 13th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies.

[11]  Pasi Liljeberg,et al.  LiRCUP: Linear Regression Based CPU Usage Prediction Algorithm for Live Migration of Virtual Machines in Data Centers , 2013, 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.

[12]  Jing Huang,et al.  Dynamic Virtual Machine migration algorithms using enhanced energy consumption model for green cloud data centers , 2014, 2014 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS).

[13]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for Cloud computing , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[14]  Azhari,et al.  Evaluation of Selection Policy with Various Virtual Machine Instances in Dynamic VM Consolidation for Energy Efficient at Cloud Data Centers , 2015, J. Networks.

[15]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  A survey and taxonomy on energy efficient resource allocation techniques for cloud computing systems , 2016, Computing.

[16]  Gargi Dasgupta,et al.  Server Workload Analysis for Power Minimization using Consolidation , 2009, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[17]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Energy and Carbon Footprint-Aware Management of Geo-Distributed Cloud Data Centers: A Taxonomy, State of the Art, and Future Directions , 2017 .